Image evaluation and breast density categories as a function of mammary positioning in full-field digital mammography

被引:4
作者
Nakano, Irene Tomoko [1 ,2 ]
de Oliveira Salvador, Gabriel Lucca [3 ]
Schelin, Hugo Reuters [4 ]
Denyak, Valeriy [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Khoury, Helen Jamil [3 ]
Tacara, Silvio [2 ]
机构
[1] Pele Pequeno Principe Res Inst, Ave Silva Jardim 1632, BR-80250200 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Radiol, Internal Med Branch, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
[5] Kharkov Inst Phys & Technol, Natl Sci Ctr, Kharkov, Ukraine
关键词
Positioning; image quality; breast density; BI-RADS; QUALITY; VIEW;
D O I
10.1177/0284185119884678
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Appropriate mammary positioning is an important factor in optimizing image quality in mammography (MMG). Purpose To study the correlation of quality criteria and breast density classification proposed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and European Guidelines and its influence to achieve a proper positioning, therefore an adequate MMG. Material and methods A total of 128 routine MMG examinations were reviewed for the definition of breast composition parenchyma and assessment of several quality criteria proposed by the ACR and European Guidelines to achieve an adequate MMG. Adequate MMG was defined as a difference between the posterior nipple line (PNL), difference of the mediolateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) incidences > 1 cm. The quality criteria were analyzed as a function of correlation coefficient in order to evaluate the individual impact of each factor and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the performance of the criteria on each type of parenchyma. Results Negative correlation of fatty breasts and visibility of the mammary angle, a greater number of skin folds and PNL > 1 cm (r < 0). Dense MMG presented less visibility of the lateral tissue compared with other categories. Area under the curve of ROC analysis revealed values of 53.1% and 54.7% for the right and left breasts, respectively. Conclusion Several factors influenced in the MMG process, but we find that breast parenchyma has a substantial role in affecting these criteria and therefore a correct position for diagnosis, which could compromise MMG diagnostic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 874
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, ACR PRACT GUID PERF
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, 16260 EUR PUBL EC
  • [3] Digital Mammography: Clinical Image Evaluation
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Hoyt, Anne C.
    Oshiro, Thomas
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (05) : 903 - +
  • [4] MAMMOGRAPHIC POSITIONING - EVALUATION FROM THE VIEW BOX
    BASSETT, LW
    HIRBAWI, IA
    DEBRUHL, N
    HAYES, MK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (03) : 803 - 806
  • [5] Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program
    Bassett, LW
    Farria, DM
    Bansal, S
    Farquhar, MA
    Wilcox, PA
    Feig, SA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (03) : 698 - 702
  • [6] Mammography image quality: Analysis of evaluation criteria using pectoral muscle presentation
    Bentley, Kelly
    Poulos, Ann
    Rickard, Mary
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2008, 14 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [7] Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on polar coordinates and the shortest path
    Cardoso, Jaime S.
    Domingues, Ines
    Amaral, Igor
    Moreira, Ines
    Passarinho, Pedro
    Comba, Joao Santa
    Correia, Ricardo
    Cardoso, Maria J.
    [J]. 2010 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2010, : 4781 - 4784
  • [8] DOrsi CJ, 2013, ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
  • [9] ASSESSING ADEQUACY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGE QUALITY
    EKLUND, GW
    CARDENOSA, G
    PARSONS, W
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 297 - 307
  • [10] EKLUND GW, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P21