How to promote sustainable development of construction and demolition waste recycling systems: Production subsidies or consumption subsidies

被引:55
作者
Guo, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Junwu [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yinghui [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Techno, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Wuhan 430000, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sanya Sci & Educ Innovat Pk, Sanya 572025, Peoples R China
关键词
Recycling; Evolutionary game model; Construction and demolition waste; Circular economy; MANAGEMENT; CHINA; COMPONENTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Every year, many new buildings are built in China, generating a lot of construction waste. Although classification and recycling of construction waste is recognized as an effective means to solve construction waste, how to improve the recycling rate of construction waste in China seems to be a thorny problem. Different from previous studies that only focused on the behavior of participants in the recycling or sales stage, this paper, more thoroughly, develops a four-party evolutionary game model, which involves the government department(GD), Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) recyclers, C&DW producers and consumers and also considers their behaviors at both the recycling stage and the sales stage. Using this model, this paper studies what kind of government subsidies could promote the sustainable development of construction waste recycling systems effectively, and analyzes the influence of several key factors among 22 factors on the model through the real data of two construction waste resource integration projects in Wuhan and Sanya, China. The results show that 1) when the GD is willing to pay high subsidies, both production and consumption subsidies could make enterprises actively participate; on the other hand, when the GD is only willing to pay fewer subsidies, subsidizing production seems to be a more effective tool; 2) by mobilizing public participation and regulating carbon trading price, the GD could promote enterprises to recycle construction waste, but it could not promote consumers to buy renewable products; 3) by investigating different enterprises, the GD can determine the potential benefits of different subsidy methods, so as to determine its own subsidy strategies. Finally, this paper provides some possible suggestions for all parties involved in the system to help China better realize the recycling of construction waste renewable resources. (c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 423
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Brahim A., 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V179
  • [2] Considerations for better construction and demolition waste management: Identifying the decision behaviors of contractors and government departments through a game theory decision-making model
    Chen, Jianguo
    Hua, Chunxiang
    Liu, Chenyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 190 - 199
  • [3] Recycling phosphogypsum and construction demolition waste for cemented paste backfill and its environmental impact
    Chen, Qiusong
    Zhang, Qinli
    Qi, Chongchong
    Fourie, Andy
    Xiao, Chongchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 186 : 418 - 429
  • [4] Comparative environmental evaluation of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition wastes in Italy
    Colangelo, Francesco
    Petrillo, Antonella
    Farina, Ilenia
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 798
  • [5] Who gets my flex? An evolutionary game theory analysis of flexibility market dynamics
    Coninx, Kristof
    Deconinck, Geert
    Holvoet, Tom
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 218 : 104 - 113
  • [6] Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making
    Di Maria, Andrea
    Eyckmans, Johan
    Van Acker, Karel
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 75 : 3 - 21
  • [7] Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholders' decision-making behaviours in construction and demolition waste management
    Du, Lei
    Feng, Yingbin
    Lu, Wei
    Kong, Lingkai
    Yang, Zhi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 84
  • [8] Construction and demolition waste management: China's lessons
    Duan, Huabo
    Li, Jinhui
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (05) : 397 - 398
  • [9] Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe
    Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis
    Styles, David
    Schoenberger, Harald
    Zeschmar-Lahl, Barbara
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 136 : 166 - 178
  • [10] Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery
    Ghaffar, Seyed Hamidreza
    Burman, Matthew
    Braimah, Nuhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244