Do Industrial Tax Abatements Spur Property Value Growth?

被引:7
作者
Kang, Sung Hoon [1 ]
Reese, Laura [2 ,3 ]
Skidmore, Mark [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Publ Finance, Room 602,1924 Hannuri Daero, Sejong Si 30147, South Korea
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Berkey Hall,Room 447,509 E Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Global Urban Studies Program, Berkey Hall,Room 447,509 E Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Econ, Room 91,446 West Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, Room 91,446 West Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, State & Local Govt Finance & Policy, Room 91,446 West Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Economic Development; Regional Competition; Tax Abatements; H71; R38; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; LOCATION DECISIONS; FIRM LOCATION; BUSINESS; TAXATION; INCENTIVES; DIFFERENTIALS; BEHAVIOR; POLICIES; SCHOOLS;
D O I
10.1002/pam.21862
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of tax abatements, Michigan's Industrial Facilities Tax (IFT) abatement program has been widely and extensively used to boost local economic development. In this article, we estimate the effects of industrial property tax abatements on industrial, residential, and commercial property value growth in the context of regional competition for a panel of 152 communities in the five counties surrounding Detroit from 1983 through 2002. We find that: (1) offering tax abatements yields statistically significant positive impacts on industrial property value growth; (2) the impacts are larger in high tax than in low tax communities; (3) there are positive spillover effects of industrial tax abatements on residential and commercial property value growth; (4) tax abatements offered in competitor communities do not appear to influence own industrial property value growth; and (5) changes in the own as well as competitor property tax rates are important determinants of industrial property value growth. However, the fiscal benefits of tax abatements are quite small as compared with the costs of offering abatements even when spillover benefits to residential and commercial properties are considered. (C) 2015 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / U200
页数:30
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Agrawal D. R., 2013, TAX GRADIENT DO LOCA
[2]   The decision to 'bid for business': Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements [J].
Anderson, JE ;
Wassmer, RW .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1995, 25 (06) :739-757
[3]   CORPORATE TAX CUTS AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Li, Quan ;
Mirkina, Irina .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (04) :977-U111
[4]  
Bartik T.J., 1992, Economic Development Quarterly, V6, P102, DOI DOI 10.1177/089124249200600110
[5]  
Bartik T.J., 2003, Michigan at the Millennium : A Benchmark and Analysis of Its Fiscal and Economic Structure, P279
[6]  
Bartik T.J., 1991, Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?
[8]  
BARTIK TJ, 1994, NATL TAX J, V47, P847
[9]   A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods [J].
Bayer, Patrick ;
Ferreira, Fernando ;
McMillan, Robert .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2007, 115 (04) :588-638
[10]  
BESLEY T, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P25