BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN RESPONSE TO SALINITY IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) DURING EARLY STAGES OF SEEDLING GROWTH

被引:0
|
作者
Arefian, M. [1 ]
Vessal, S. [2 ]
Bagheri, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Coll Agr, Dept Plant Biotechnol & Breeding, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Res Ctr Plant Sci, Mashhad, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES | 2014年 / 24卷 / 06期
关键词
Chickpea; Proline; Salinity; Total chlorophyll; Total soluble protein; SALT STRESS; ANTIOXIDANT; TOLERANCE; NITROGEN; PROLINE; PLANTS; ROOTS; PEA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Salinity is a serious abiotic stress, causing oxidative stress. Various biochemical parameters in chickpea genotypes were considered under varied NaCl concentrations (0, 8 and 12 dS.m(-1)). This experiment was done as factorial arrangement (genotype x salt concentration x time) in a completely randomized design. Samples were collected at 21 and 28-day old seedlings (28-DOS). The results revealed that increasing salt concentration resulted in higher levels for malondialdehyde content; among genotypes, MCC806 with 2.2 and MCC760 with 0.7 had the highest and lowest amount, respectively. Proline and protein contents were significantly higher in MCC544 by 27-fold increase (for proline) and 30% (for protein) relative to control in 28 DAS at 12 dS.m(-1) of salt. The leaf soluble carbohydrates also increased significantly in MCC544 and MCC760 compared with the others. The minimum decline of electrolyte leakages (6%) was belonged to MCC760 while MCC806 genotypes showed the highest decrease rate (more than 20%). Total leaf chlorophyll content decreased in all genotypes during the stress. However, morphological damages in MCC544 and MCC760 genotypes were less in 28-DOS at 8 and 12 dS.m(-1) NaCl, respectively. Overall, proline and leaf soluble carbohydrates were more consistent with salt tolerance responses of the genotypes, and 2 weeks after stress initiation (28-DOS) could be a critical stage for screening the genotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:1849 / 1857
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physiological and gene expression analysis of extreme chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in response to salinity stress
    Mohammad Arefian
    Saeid Malekzadeh Shafaroudi
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37
  • [22] Selection criteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Toker, C
    Cagirgan, MI
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2003, 53 (01): : 42 - 45
  • [23] Clustering of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Accessions
    Klaudia Jomová
    Michaela Benková
    Mária Žáková
    Edita Gregová
    Ján Kraic
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2005, 52 : 1039 - 1048
  • [24] Physiological and nutritional responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) to salinity
    Krouma, Abdelmajid
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2009, 33 (05) : 503 - 512
  • [25] An Efficient Micropropagation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Rekha, K. T.
    Thiruvengadam, M.
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2009, 92 (03): : 320 - 326
  • [26] Multivariate analyses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Ghafoor, A
    Ahmad, Z
    Javaid, A
    Ashraf, M
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2003, 35 (03) : 369 - 376
  • [27] Biochemical Basis of Resistance in Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) against Wilt Complex
    Parmar, H. V.
    Gohel, N. M.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (11) : 2011 - 2015
  • [28] DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF CHICKPEA (CICER-ARIETINUM) GENOTYPES TO SALINITY
    DUA, RP
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1992, 119 : 367 - 371
  • [29] Impact of elevated temperatures on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Jumrani, Kanchan
    Bhatia, Virender Singh
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 164 : 90 - 97
  • [30] Flowering response of diverse chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) accessions to photoperiod
    Daba, Ketema
    Tar'an, Bunyamin
    Warkentin, Thomas D.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2016, 63 (07) : 1161 - 1172