Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity

被引:6
作者
Froeschen, Frank S. [1 ]
Randau, Thomas M. [1 ]
Gravius, Nadine [1 ]
Wirtz, Dieter C. [1 ]
Gravius, Sascha [2 ]
Walter, Sebastian G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Revision total hip arthroplasty; pelvic discontinuity; acetabular bone loss; custom-made implant; risk factor; treatment failure; periprosthetic joint infection; aseptic loosening; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; RECONSTRUCTION; INFECTION; MANAGEMENT; COMPONENT; DEFECT;
D O I
10.3233/THC-202236
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA), both with or without pelvic discontinuity, remains a great challenge in orthopaedic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for failure of custom-made acetabular implants in RTHA. METHODS: Seventy patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type III) and pelvic discontinuity, who required RTHA, were included in our study. All prostheses were constructed based on a thin-layer computed-tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis. The treatment was considered unsuccessful in the event of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or aseptic loosening (AL) with need for explantation of the custom-made acetabular implant. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 41.9 +/- 34.8 months (range 1.5-120). Implant survival at last follow-up was 75.7% (53 of 70). Explantation was necessary in 17 cases (15 PJI; 2 AL). Previous PJI as reason for RTHA (p = 0.025; OR 3.56 (95% CI: 1.14; 11.21)), additional revision of femoral components (p = 0.003; OR 8.4 (95% CI: 1.75; 40.42)), rheumatoid disease (p = 0.039; OR 3.43 (95% CI: 1.01; 11.40)), elevated preoperative CRP > 15.2 mg/l (p = 0.015; AUC: 0.7) and preoperative haemoglobin < 10.05 (p = 0.022; AUC: 0.69) were statistically significant risk factors associated with treatment failure. Age and BMI were not statistically significant contributing to implant failure. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for treatment failure were a previous PJI, additional revision of femoral component, rheumatoid disease, elevated preoperative CRP and low preoperative haemoglobin. Awareness of these risk factors will help to improve future treatment standards.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 711
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Perioperative and Modifiable Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJI) and Recommended Guidelines
    Alamanda V.K.
    Springer B.D.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2018, 11 (3) : 325 - 331
  • [2] Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Debridement and Retention of Implant: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections
    Argenson, Jean Noel
    Arndt, Marius
    Babis, George
    Battenberg, Andrew
    Budhiparama, Nicolaas
    Catani, Fabio
    Chen, Foster
    de Beaubien, Brian
    Ebied, Ayman
    Esposito, Silvano
    Ferry, Christopher
    Flores, Henry
    Giorgini, Andrea
    Hansen, Erik
    Hernugrahanto, K. D.
    Hyonmin, Choe
    Kim, Tae-Kyun
    Koh, In Jun
    Komnos, Georgios
    Lausmann, Christian
    Loloi, Jeremy
    Lora-Tamayo, Jaime
    Lumban-Gaol, I.
    Mahyudin, F.
    Mancheno-Losa, Mikel
    Marculescu, Camelia
    Marei, Sameh
    Martin, Kimberly E.
    Meshram, Prashant
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    Poultsides, Lazaros
    Saxena, Arjun
    Schwechter, Evan
    Shah, Jay
    Shohat, Noam
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Soriano, Alex
    Stefansdottir, Anna
    Suleiman, Linda I.
    Taylor, Adrian
    Triantafyllopoulos, Georgios K.
    Utomo, Dwikora Novembri
    Warren, David
    Whiteside, Leo
    Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
    Yombi, Jean
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (02) : S399 - S419
  • [3] Are Custom Triflange Acetabular Components Effective for Reconstruction of Catastrophic Bone Loss?
    Berasi, Carl C.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    Ruh, Erin L.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (02) : 528 - 535
  • [4] Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
    Chiarlone, Francesco
    Zanirato, Andrea
    Cavagnaro, Luca
    Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
    Felli, Lamberto
    Burastero, Giorgio
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (03) : 415 - 424
  • [5] Christie MJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P216
  • [6] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [7] Risk Factors and Treatment Options for Failure of a Two-Stage Exchange
    Fagotti L.
    Tatka J.
    Salles M.J.C.
    Queiroz M.C.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2018, 11 (3) : 420 - 427
  • [8] Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty
    Friedrich, Max J.
    Schmolders, Jan
    Michel, Robert D.
    Randau, Thomas M.
    Wimmer, Matthias D.
    Kohlhof, Hendrik
    Wirtz, Dieter C.
    Gravius, Sascha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (12) : 2455 - 2461
  • [9] Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss
    Froeschen, F. S.
    Randau, T. M.
    Hischebeth, G. T. R.
    Gravius, N.
    Gravius, S.
    Walter, S. G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) : 263 - 273
  • [10] Outcome of repeated multi-stage arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with severe acetabular bone loss: a case series
    Froeschen, Frank S.
    Randau, Thomas M.
    Hischebeth, Gunnar T. R.
    Gravius, Nadine
    Wirtz, Dieter C.
    Gravius, Sascha
    Walter, Sebastian G.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (1_SUPPL) : 64 - 71