Numerical modelling of two full-scale reinforced soil wrapped-face walls

被引:64
作者
Yu, Yan [1 ]
Bathurst, Richard J. [1 ]
Allen, Tony M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Dept Civil Engn, Queens RMC, GeoEngn Ctr, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
[2] Washington State Dept Transportat, State Mat Lab, POB 47365, Olympia, WA 98504 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Geosynthetics; Welded wire; Wrapped-face walls; Numerical modelling; Instrumented wall; Mechanically stabilized walls; Soil reinforcement; FLAC; Simplified Method; Simplified Stiffness Method; WORKING STRESS CONDITIONS; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; K-STIFFNESS METHOD; RETAINING WALLS; SEGMENTAL WALLS; GEOSYNTHETIC WALLS; PERFORMANCE; LOADS; DEFORMATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.02.004
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The paper reports the details of numerical models used to predict the performance of two 3.6 m-high well-instrumented wrapped-face walls. The walls were nominally identical except that the reinforcement material in one wall was a steel welded wire mesh and in the other a biaxial polypropylene geogrid. The backfill soil was modelled using both linear and nonlinear elastic-plastic constitutive models. A general hyperbolic (nonlinear) axial load-strain-time model was used for the reinforcement. The numerical results show good agreement with measured performance features for the welded wire mesh wrapped-face wall. Agreement between numerical predictions of facing displacements and maximum reinforcement loads was less accurate for the very flexible geogrid wrapped-face wall. The discrepancies are believed to be related to the unusually flexible wrapped face used in the geogrid wall construction. Numerically predicted and measured maximum reinforcement loads are compared to loads using the AASHTO reinforcement strength-based design approach (Simplified Method) and the Simplified Stiffness Method which is an empirical reinforcement stiffness-based method. The paper provides physical test data that can be used to benchmark other numerical models, highlights lessons learned during the development of the models, and identifies reasonable expectations for numerical model accuracy for models of similar complexity used to simulate the performance of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall structures under operational conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 249
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2014, AASHTO LFRP bridge design specifications
[2]  
Allen T. M., 1992, P INT S GEOS REINF S, P81
[3]  
Allen T.M., 2015, ASCE J GEOTECH GEOEN, V141
[4]   New method for prediction of loads in steel reinforced soil walls [J].
Allen, TM ;
Bathurst, RJ ;
Holtz, RD ;
Lee, WF ;
Walters, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (11) :1109-1120
[5]   A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls [J].
Allen, TM ;
Bathurst, RJ ;
Holtz, RD ;
Walters, D ;
Lee, WF .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (05) :976-994
[6]  
ALLEN TM, 2014, ASCE J GEOTECH GEO E, V140
[7]   Performance of an 11 m high block-faced geogrid wall designed using the K-stiffness method [J].
Allen, Tony M. ;
Bathurst, Richard J. .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01) :16-29
[8]  
Anderson L.R., 1987, proceedings of Soil Improvement, P280
[9]   Refinement of K-stiffness Method for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls [J].
Bathurst, R. J. ;
Miyata, Y. ;
Nernheim, A. ;
Allen, A. M. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 15 (04) :269-295
[10]   Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls [J].
Bathurst, R. J. ;
Nernheim, A. ;
Walters, D. L. ;
Allen, T. M. ;
Burgess, P. ;
Saunders, D. D. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (01) :43-59