Abdominal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引：23

作者：

McDermott, Colleen D. ^{[2
]}

Hale, Douglass S. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

[2] Indiana Univ, Methodist Hosp, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

来源：

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA | 2009年 / 36卷 / 03期

关键词：

Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral; Sacral colpopexy; Sacral colpoperineopexy; Paravaginal; Laparoscopic; Robotic; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; PARAVAGINAL DEFECT REPAIR; TERM FOLLOW-UP; SACRAL COLPOPEXY; UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT; UTERINE SUSPENSION; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; SYNTHETIC MESH; UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ogc.2009.09.004

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Abdominal correction of pelvic organ prolapse remains a viable option for patients and surgeons. The transition from open procedures to less invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries is evident in the literature. This article reviews the surgical options available for pelvic organ prolapse repair and their reported outcomes. Procedures reviewed include apical support (sacral, uterosacral, and others), and abdominal anterior and posterior vaginal wall support. Long-term follow-up and appropriately designed studies will further help direct surgeons in deciding which approach to incorporate into their practice.

引用

页码：585 / +

页数：32

共 132 条

[51] Abdominal sacral colpopexy with allograft fascia tata: One-year outcomes [J].