Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in Austria: the online registry of the Qualitatspartnerschaft Urologie (QuapU)

被引:0
|
作者
Eredics, Klaus [1 ]
Dorfinger, Karl
Kramer, Gero [2 ]
Ponholzer, Anton [3 ]
Madersbacher, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Franz Josef Spital, Dept Urol, Kundratstr 3, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; PSA; Low risk disease; Localised prostate cancer; Prostatic neoplasms; Prostate-specific antigen; Biopsy; Disease progression; UPDATE; MEN; MANAGEMENT; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00508-016-1149-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Active surveillance (AS) is a well-recognized strategy to reduce the risk of overtreatment in men with low-risk prostate cancer. No data on this approach are available from Austria. The Qualitatspartnerschaft Urologie (QuapU) developed an online database for patients managed with AS in Austria. Principal inclusion/exclusion criteria corresponded to those of the S3 prostate cancer guideline of German urologists: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, Gleason score < 7 (maximum 20% of biopsies being positive). Control visits were scheduled at 3aEuromonth intervals, control biopsies were scheduled at 12 and 36 months. To date 131 patients have been entered into this data base. Mean patient age is 64 years, 6% were younger than 50 years, two thirds of patients were aged 50-70 years and 25% were older than 70 years. Mean PSA value was 5.9 ng/ml (PSA 0-4 ng/ml: 15%; PSA > 4-10 ng/ml: 85%). The prostate volume averaged 39 ml. The mean time under AS was 17.5 months (< 12 months: 60%; > 12 months: 40%). The AS adherence at 12 months was 85% and at 24 months 76%. To date, a total of 23 patients (17.6%) stopped AS. The most frequent reasons for discontinuing AS were patient wish for active treatment (43.5%) and PSA progression (30.4%). A histological progression was rarely seen (6.1%) and the control biopsy rate was low (19.8%). This study is the first description of AS in Austria and documents the feasibility of an online registry for AS. The data confirm the international experience with this approach with acceptable adherence rates.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 379
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Klotz, Laurence
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2011, 8 (06) : 312 - 320
  • [22] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Large, Michael C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2009, 23 (11): : 974 - 979
  • [23] Trends in active surveillance for very low-risk prostate cancer: do guidelines influence modern practice?
    Parikh, Rahul R.
    Kim, Sinae
    Stein, Mark N.
    Haffty, Bruce G.
    Kim, Isaac Y.
    Goyal, Sharad
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (10): : 2410 - 2418
  • [24] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer - in pursuit of a standardized protocol
    Sosnowski, Roman
    Kamecki, Hubert
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    Rudzinski, Jan K.
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Klotz, Laurence
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 123 - 126
  • [25] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: knowledge, acceptance and practice among urologists
    Gorin, M. A.
    Eldefrawy, A.
    Ekwenna, O.
    Soloway, M. S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (02) : 177 - 181
  • [26] Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018
    Briganti, Alberto
    Fossati, Nicola
    Catto, James W. F.
    Cornford, Philip
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Wirth, Manfred
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (03) : 357 - 368
  • [27] Novel Tools to Improve Patient Selection and Monitoring on Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Villers, Arnauld
    Parker, Christopher C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1023 - 1031
  • [28] Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists
    Ellis, Shellie D.
    Hwang, Soohyun
    Morrow, Emily
    Kimminau, Kim S.
    Goonan, Kelly
    Petty, Laurie
    Ellerbeck, Edward
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [29] Prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients treated for testosterone deficiency while on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Hashimoto, Takeshi
    Rahul, Krishnan
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Benfante, Nicole
    Mulhall, John P.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Eastham, James A.
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (12) : 530.e9 - 530.e14
  • [30] Can we expand the borders in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer?
    Islamoglu, Ekrem
    Kisa, Erdem
    Yucel, Cem
    Celik, Orcun
    Cakmak, Ozgur
    Yalbuzdag, Okan
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 12 (01) : 54 - 59