Text messaging and lottery incentive to improve colorectal cancer screening outreach at a community health center: A randomized controlled trial

被引:17
作者
Mehta, Shivan J. [1 ,2 ]
Oyalowo, Akinbowale [1 ]
Reitz, Catherine [1 ,3 ]
Dean, Owen [1 ,3 ]
McAuliffe, Timothy [1 ,3 ]
Asch, David A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Doubeni, Chyke A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Hlth Care Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Philadelphia VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Ctr Hlth Equ & Community Engagement Res, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Text messaging; Incentives; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; RATES; INTERVENTION; REMINDERS; PROMPTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101114
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Efforts to boost colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in underserved populations have been limited by effectiveness and scalability. We evaluate the impact of adding a lottery-based financial incentive to a text messaging program that asks patients to opt-in to receive mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT). This is a two-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial at a community health center in Southwest Philadelphia from April to July 2017. We included CRC screening-eligible patients between ages 50-74 years who had a mobile phone, active health insurance, and at least one visit to the clinic in the past 12 months. Patients received a text message about CRC screening with the opportunity to opt-in to receive mailed FIT. They were randomized 1:1 to the following: (1) text messaging outreach alone (text), or (2) text messaging with lottery for a 1-in-5 chance of winning $100 after FIT completion (text + lottery). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients completing the mailed FIT within 3 months of initial outreach. 281 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The FIT completion rate was 12.1% (95% CI, 6.7%-17.5%) in the text message arm and 12.1% (95% CI, 6.7%-17.5%) in the lottery arm, with no statistical difference between arms. The majority of post-intervention interview respondents found text messaging to be acceptable and convenient. Opt-in text messaging is a feasible option to promote the uptake of mailed FIT screening, but the addition of a lottery-based incentive did not improve completion rates.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Misdirections in Informed Consent - Impediments to Health Care Innovation [J].
Asch, David A. ;
Ziolek, Tracy A. ;
Mehta, Shivan J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (15) :1412-1414
[2]   Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates at Community Health Centers that Use Electronic Health Records: A Cross Sectional Study [J].
Baker, David W. ;
Liss, David T. ;
Alperovitz-Bichell, Kari ;
Brown, Tiffany ;
Carroll, Joseph E. ;
Crawford, Phil ;
Harigopal, Padmini ;
Henley, Eric ;
Nelson, Christine A. ;
Rittner, Sarah S. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2015, 26 (02) :377-390
[3]   Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management [J].
Cole-Lewis, Heather ;
Kershaw, Trace .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2010, 32 (01) :56-69
[4]   Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Petrik, Amanda F. ;
Vollmer, William M. ;
Taplin, Stephen H. ;
Keast, Erin M. ;
Fields, Scott ;
Green, Beverly B. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (09) :1174-1181
[5]   Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Dougherty, Michael K. ;
Brenner, Alison T. ;
Crockett, Seth D. ;
Gupta, Shivani ;
Wheeler, Stephanie B. ;
Coker-Schwimmer, Manny ;
Cubillos, Laura ;
Malo, Teri ;
Reuland, Daniel S. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (12) :1645-1658
[6]   Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes [J].
Gollwitzer, Peter M. ;
Sheeran, Paschal .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 38, 2006, 38 :69-119
[7]   An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Trial [J].
Green, Beverly B. ;
Wang, Ching-Yun ;
Anderson, Melissa L. ;
Chubak, Jessica ;
Meenan, Richard T. ;
Vernon, Sally W. ;
Fuller, Sharon .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (05) :301-311
[8]   Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial [J].
Gupta, Samir ;
Miller, Stacie ;
Koch, Mark ;
Berry, Emily ;
Anderson, Paula ;
Pruitt, Sandi L. ;
Borton, Eric ;
Hughes, Amy E. ;
Carter, Elizabeth ;
Hernandez, Sylvia ;
Pozos, Helen ;
Halm, Ethan A. ;
Gneezy, Ayelet ;
Lieberman, Alicea J. ;
Skinner, Celette Sugg ;
Argenbright, Keith ;
Balasubramanian, Bijal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (11) :1630-1636
[9]   Harnessing the Question-Behavior Effect to Enhance Colorectal Cancer Screening in an mHealth Experiment [J].
Hagoel, Lea ;
Neter, Efrat ;
Stein, Nili ;
Rennert, Gad .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (11) :1998-2004
[10]   The Impact of Alternative Incentive Schemes on Completion of Health Risk Assessments [J].
Haisley, Emily ;
Volpp, Kevin G. ;
Pellathy, Thomas ;
Loewenstein, George .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2012, 26 (03) :184-188