Institutional investors and stock return anomalies

被引:155
作者
Edelen, Roger M. [1 ]
Ince, Ozgur S. [2 ]
Kadlec, Gregory B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Davis Grad Sch Mancigement, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Darla Moore Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Pamplin Coll Business, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Investor base; Limits-of-arbitrage; Mispricing; Herding; Trading strategies; CROSS-SECTION; MUTUAL FUNDS; RISK; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; OWNERSHIP; IMPACT; PERSISTENCE; LIMITS; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine institutional demand prior to well-known stock return anomalies and find that institutions have a strong tendency to buy stocks classified as overvalued (short leg of anomaly), and that these stocks have particularly negative ex post abnormal returns. Our results differ from numerous studies documenting a positive relation between institutional demand and future returns. We trace the difference to measurement horizon. We too find a positive relation at a quarterly horizon. However, the relation turns strongly negative at the one-year horizon used in anomaly studies. We consider several explanations for institutions' tendency to trade contrary to anomaly prescriptions. Our evidence largely rules out explanations based on flow and limits-of-arbitrage, but is more consistent with agency-induced preferences for stock characteristics that relate to poor long-run performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 488
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   When do high stock returns trigger equity issues? [J].
Alti, Aydogan ;
Sulaeman, Johan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 103 (01) :61-87
[2]  
[Anonymous], J FINANCE IN PRESS
[3]   Momentum trading by institutions [J].
Badrinath, SG ;
Wahal, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (06) :2449-2478
[4]   Style investing [J].
Barberis, N ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 68 (02) :161-199
[5]   Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences [J].
Bennett, JA ;
Sias, RW ;
Starks, LT .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (04) :1203-1238
[6]   EVIDENCE THAT STOCK-PRICES DO NOT FULLY REFLECT THE IMPLICATIONS OF CURRENT EARNINGS FOR FUTURE EARNINGS [J].
BERNARD, VL ;
THOMAS, JK .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1990, 13 (04) :305-340
[7]   Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry [J].
Brown, KC ;
Harlow, WV ;
Starks, LT .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (01) :85-110
[8]   On persistence in mutual fund performance [J].
Carhart, MM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :57-82
[9]  
Chalmers JohnM.R., 1999, ANAL MUTUAL FUND TRA
[10]   The value of active mutual fund management: An examination of the stockholdings and trades of fund managers [J].
Chen, HL ;
Jegadeesh, N ;
Wermers, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2000, 35 (03) :343-368