Structural and construct validity of the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life scale

被引:8
作者
Ensari, Ipek [1 ]
Motl, Robert W. [1 ]
McAuley, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, 906 S Goodwin Ave,233 Freer Hall, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Quality of life; Construct validity; Factor analysis; Well-being; SELF-EFFICACY; COMPOSITE INDICATORS; CAUSAL INDICATORS; PAIN; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; FATIGUE; PEOPLE; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-015-1202-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (LMSQOL) scale was designed as an 8-item, unidimensional disease-targeted measure of quality of life (QOL). This study (1) tested the unidimensionality of the LMSQOL using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and (2) examined the construct validity of scores based on a nomological network. The sample (N = 292) included persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were recruited from the Midwest region of the USA. Participants completed questionnaires that were delivered and returned using US Postal Service. We tested the fit of a single-factor model for the LMSQOL using CFA with the diagonally weighted least squares estimator in R. We examined the construct validity of the LMSQOL scores using Spearman rank-order correlations (r (s)) in SPSS. The single-factor model had a reasonable fit for the 8-item LMSQOL [chi (2) (20) = 83.19, p < .001, CFI = .97, SRMR = .07], but provided an excellent fit for a 7-item version of the LMSQOL [chi (2) (14) = 23.63, p > .05, CFI = .99, SRMR = .05]. LMSQOL scores demonstrated strong correlations with measures of psychological well-being (|r (s)| = .53-.74) and weak-to-moderate correlations with measures of physical functioning and disability (|r (s)| = .23-.57). The unidimensional model provides a good fit for the LMSQOL, and its scores provide a valid measure of QOL in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1611
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT J MS CARE, DOI DOI 10.7224/1537-2073-12.1.34
[2]   Measuring the Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Clinical Practice: A Necessary Challenge [J].
Baumstarck, Karine ;
Boyer, Laurent ;
Boucekine, Mohamed ;
Michel, Pierre ;
Pelletier, Jean ;
Auquier, Pascal .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
[3]   A review about the impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life [J].
Benito-León, J ;
Morales, JM ;
Rivera-Navarro, J ;
Mitchell, AJ .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (23) :1291-1303
[4]   Three Cs in Measurement Models: Causal Indicators, Composite Indicators, and Covariates [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Bauldry, Shawn .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (03) :265-284
[5]   Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction? [J].
Costa, Daniel S. J. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (09) :2057-2065
[6]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[7]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[8]  
Fayers PM, 1997, QUAL LIFE RES, V6, P139
[9]   Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis [J].
Ford, HL ;
Gerry, E ;
Tennant, A ;
Whalley, D ;
Haigh, R ;
Johnson, MH .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 15 (03) :247-258
[10]  
GODIN G, 1985, Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, V10, P141