Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study

被引:76
作者
Iturrate, Mikel [1 ]
Eguiraun, Harkaitz [2 ,3 ]
Solaberrieta, Eneko [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Business Management, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, Bilbao, Spain
[3] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Res Ctr Expt Marine Biol & Biotechnol, Plentzia Marine Stn, Plentzia, Spain
[4] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, Plaza Europa 1, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
accuracy; complete arch; digital impression; edentulous; implant-supported framework; intraoral scan; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; INTRAORAL SCANNERS; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; TIME-EFFICIENCY; VIVO PRECISION; MARGINAL FIT; CROWNS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13549
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions for fabrication of an implant-supported prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla using an auxiliary geometry part. Materials and methods A replica of the upper jaw of an edentulous patient with four scannable impression copings was fabricated in stainless steel. This model was scanned with an industrial non-contact 3D structured blue light 3D scanner, and the measurements of three reference distances were established as reference values. Subsequently, the model was scanned in two different scenarios (with or without an auxiliary geometry part put in place and fixed to the model) using three intraoral scanners. Measurements were taken with 3D inspection software, and a digital impression of the complete arch was built with mesh processing software by combining 2 STL files obtained with an intraoral scanner. Results All measurements with the auxiliary geometry part gave significantly more accurate results (p < .05). Trueness improved in the three reference distances, reaching values of 8 +/- 6 mu m at D12 reference distance, 20 +/- 11 mu m at D13 and 35 +/- 22 mu m at D14. Precision also improved significantly with the use of the auxiliary geometry part placed on the model (p < .05). The best precision results at reference distances D13 and D14 were obtained with the True Definition Scanner. Conclusions The proposed methodology significantly improves the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions in edentulous patients obtained in vitro, regardless of which scanner is used.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1258
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial [J].
Ahrberg, Danush ;
Lauer, Hans Christoph ;
Ahrberg, Martin ;
Weigl, Paul .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) :291-300
[2]  
Ali AO, 2015, DENTISTRY, V5, P300
[3]   Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study [J].
Amin, Sarah ;
Weber, Hans Peter ;
Finkelman, Matthew ;
El Rafie, Khaled ;
Kudara, Yukio ;
Papaspyridakos, Panos .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) :1360-1367
[4]   Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study [J].
Andriessen, Frank S. ;
Riikens, David R. ;
van der Meer, Wither J. ;
Wismeijer, Daniell W. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (03) :186-194
[5]  
CARR AB, 1995, J DENT RES, V74, P22
[6]   MARGINAL FIT OF GOLD INLAY CASTINGS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1966, 16 (02) :297-+
[7]  
Dodmon H. W., 1982, OPERATIVE DENT, V7, P97
[8]  
Duret F, 1991, Curr Opin Dent, V1, P150
[9]   In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions [J].
Ender, Andreas ;
Zimmermann, Moritz ;
Attin, Thomas ;
Mehl, Albert .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (07) :1495-1504
[10]   In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions [J].
Ender, Andreas ;
Attin, Thomas ;
Mehl, Albert .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (03) :313-320