Coping with compliance during take-off and landing in the diamond dove (Geopelia cuneata)

被引:13
作者
Crandell, Kristen E. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Austin F. [1 ]
Crino, Ondi L. [3 ]
Tobalske, Bret W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Field Res Stn Ft Missoula, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Bangor Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[3] Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Geelong, Vic, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
JUMPING PERFORMANCE; ANOLIS-CAROLINENSIS; PERCH COMPLIANCE; KINEMATICS; LOCOMOTION; SUBSTRATE; MECHANICS; BEHAVIOR; LIZARDS; FLIGHT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0199662
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The natural world is filled with substrates of varying properties that challenge locomotor abilities. Birds appear to transition smoothly from aerial to terrestrial environments during take-offs and landings using substrates that are incredibly variable. It may be challenging to control movement on and off compliant (flexible) substrates such as twigs, yet birds routinely accomplish such tasks. Previous research suggests that birds do not use their legs to harness elastic recoil from perches. Given avian mastery of take-off and landing, we hypothesized that birds instead modulate wing, body and tail movements to effectively use compliant perches. We measured take-off and landing performance of diamond doves (Geopelia cuneata (N= 5) in the laboratory and perch selection in this species in the field (N = 25). Contrary to our hypothesis, doves do not control take-off and landing on compliant perches as effectively as they do on stiff perches. They do not recover elastic energy from the perch, and take-off velocities are thus negatively impacted. Landing velocities remain unchanged, which suggests they may not anticipate the need to compensate for compliance. Legs and wings function as independent units: legs produce lower initial velocities when taking off from a compliant substrate, which negatively impacts later flight velocities. During landing, significant stability problems arise with compliance that are ameliorated by the wings and tail. Collectively, we suggest that the diamond dove maintains a generalized take-off and landing behavior regardless of perch compliance, leading us to conclude that perch compliance represents a challenge for flying birds. Free-living diamond doves avoid the negative impacts of compliance by preferentially selecting perches of larger diameter, which tend to be stiffer.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER R M, 1991, Zeitschrift fuer Morphologie und Anthropologie, V78, P315
[2]   LEG DESIGN AND JUMPING TECHNIQUE FOR HUMANS, OTHER VERTEBRATES AND INSECTS [J].
ALEXANDER, RM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 347 (1321) :235-248
[3]   Robust jumping performance and elastic energy recovery from compliant perches in tree frogs [J].
Astley, Henry C. ;
Haruta, Alison ;
Roberts, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 218 (21) :3360-3363
[4]   Does substrate quality influence take-off decisions in Common Starlings? [J].
Bonser, RHC ;
Norman, AP ;
Rayner, JMV .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 13 (01) :102-105
[6]  
Earls KD, 2000, J EXP BIOL, V203, P725
[7]  
Gatesy SM, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04496.x
[8]   Foils of flexion: the effects of perch compliance on lizard locomotion and perch choice in the wild [J].
Gilman, Casey A. ;
Irschick, Duncan J. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) :374-381
[9]   Total recoil: perch compliance alters jumping performance and kinematics in green anole lizards (Anolis carolinensis) [J].
Gilman, Casey A. ;
Bartlett, Michael D. ;
Gillis, Gary B. ;
Irschick, Duncan J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 215 (02) :220-226
[10]  
Green PR, 1998, J EXP BIOL, V201, P3309