Energy intensity and foreign direct investment nexus: Advanced panel data analysis

被引:24
作者
Petrovic, Predrag [1 ]
Lobanov, Mikhail M. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Social Sci, Kraljice Natalije Str 45, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Econ, Nakhimovsky Ave 32, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Energy intensity; Foreign direct investment; Technological development; Technological spillover; Energy-saving effect; CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST; UNIT-ROOT; TIME-SERIES; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; CHINA; TRADE; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118669
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on energy intensity. The survey was conducted on a large panel sample of 81 (43) countries for the period 1990-2014 (1991-2014) using advanced econometric methods that eliminate the methodological and conceptual weaknesses of the existing papers. The obtained results reveal energy-saving effect of foreign direct investment that is realized directly and indirectly. Every new net inflow of foreign direct investment reduces energy intensity. The strength of this negative impact depends on the level of countries' technological development and the degree of their inventive activity. The higher the level of technological development, the more pronounced the energy-saving effect of foreign direct investment. When taking into account the average level of technological development for the entire sample, it can be concluded that each additional foreign direct investment net inflow of one billion dollars results in a decrease in energy intensity by 0.23%. The findings of this study confirm the hypothesis that more technologically developed countries have higher absorption capacity and can easily accept and exploit potential foreign direct investment technological spillover. Since the results of the analysis indisputably show that foreign direct investment reduces energy intensity, some useful guidelines for attracting quality foreign direct investment have been proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTIMATORS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME-SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT [J].
DICKEY, DA ;
FULLER, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (366) :427-431
[22]   Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root [J].
Elliott, G ;
Rothenberg, TJ ;
Stock, JH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (04) :813-836
[23]   Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: A Chinese city-level study [J].
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Sun, Puyang ;
Chen, Siyang .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 :484-494
[24]   Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis [J].
Eskeland, GS ;
Harrison, AE .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2003, 70 (01) :1-23
[25]  
Fisher-Vanden K, 2004, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V26, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.resenecco.2003.07.002
[26]   Foreign versus indigenous innovation and energy intensity: Further research across Chinese regions [J].
Herrerias, M. J. ;
Cuadros, A. ;
Luo, D. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 :1374-1384
[27]   Energy intensity and investment ownership across Chinese provinces [J].
Herrerias, M. J. ;
Cuadros, A. ;
Orts, V. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :286-298
[28]   POPULATION AND THE ENERGY PROBLEM [J].
HOLDREN, JP .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 12 (03) :231-255
[29]   Energy savings via FDI? Empirical evidence from developing countries [J].
Huebler, Michael ;
Keller, Andreas .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 15 :59-80
[30]   Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels [J].
Im, KS ;
Pesaran, MH ;
Shin, Y .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 115 (01) :53-74