PROMIS 4-item measures and numeric rating scales efficiently assess SPADE symptoms compared with legacy measures

被引:30
作者
Kroenke, Kurt [1 ,2 ]
Stump, Timothy E. [3 ,4 ]
Kean, Jacob [5 ]
Talib, Tasneem L. [2 ]
Haggstrom, David A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Monahan, Patrick O. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Regenstrief Inst Inc, 1101 West 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Biostat, Fairbanks Sch Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[4] Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Roudebush VA Med Ctr, VA Ctr Hlth Informat & Commun, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Psychometrics; Pain; Depression; Anxiety; Sleep; Fatigue; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; PAIN INTERFERENCE; SHORT-FORMS; COMPARATIVE RESPONSIVENESS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; COMMON SYMPTOMS; HEALTH; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.018
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The 5 SPADE (sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) symptoms are among the most prevalent and disabling symptoms in clinical practice. This study evaluates the minimally important difference (MID) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures and their correspondence with other brief measures to assess SPADE symptoms. Study Design and Setting: Three hundred primary care patients completed a 4-item PROMIS scale, a numeric rating scale (NRS), and a non-PROMIS legacy scale for each of the 5 SPADE symptoms. Optimal NRS cutpoints were examined, and cross-walk units for converting legacy measure scores to PROMIS scores were determined. PROMIS scores corresponding to standard deviation (SD) and standard error of measurement (SEM) changes in legacy scores were used to estimate MID. Results: At an NRS >= 5, the mean PROMIS T-score exceeded 55 (the operational threshold for a clinically meaningful symptom) for each SPADE symptom. Correlations were high (0.70-0.86) between each PROMIS scale and its corresponding non-PROMIS legacy scale. Changes in non-PROMIS legacy scale scores of 0.35 SD and 1 SEM corresponded to mean PROMIS T-scores of 2.92 and 3.05 across the 5 SPADE symptoms, with changes in 0.2 and 0.5 SD corresponding to mean PROMIS T-scores of 1.67 and 4.16. Conclusion: A 2-step screening process for SPADE symptoms might use single-item NRS scores, proceeding to PROMIS scales for NRS scores >= 5. A PROMIS T-score change of three points represents a reasonable MID estimate, with two to four points approximating lower and upper bounds. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Measures Of Psychosocial Issues And Health Behavior Should Be Added To Electronic Health Records
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    Kaplan, Robert M.
    Ockene, Judith K.
    Fisher, Edwin B.
    Emmons, Karen M.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (03) : 497 - 504
  • [22] The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (01) : 115 - 123
  • [23] Acceptability of a telecare intervention for persistent musculoskeletal pain
    Guilkey, Rebecca E.
    Draucker, Claire B.
    Wu, Jingwei
    Yu, Zhangsheng
    Kroenke, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2018, 24 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [24] Hays RD, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P28
  • [25] How Much Is Lost in Using Single Items?
    Hays, Ron D.
    Reise, Steven
    Calderon, Jose Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (11) : 1402 - 1403
  • [26] Evaluating dizziness
    Hoffman, RM
    Einstadter, D
    Kroenke, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 107 (05) : 468 - 478
  • [27] Telecare Management of Pain and Depression in Patients With Cancer Patient Satisfaction and Predictors of Use
    Johns, Shelley A.
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Theobald, Dale E.
    Wu, Jingwei
    Tu, Wanzhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 34 (02) : 126 - 139
  • [28] EFFECT SIZES FOR INTERPRETING CHANGES IN HEALTH-STATUS
    KAZIS, LE
    ANDERSON, JJ
    MEENAN, RF
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) : S178 - S189
  • [29] Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms, Brief Pain Inventory, PEG, and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale
    Kean, Jacob
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Wu, Jingwei
    Yu, Zhangsheng
    Stump, Tim E.
    Krebs, Erin E.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2016, 54 (04) : 414 - 421
  • [30] Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management?
    King, Madeleine T.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) : S38 - S45