Supervised Machine Learning for Predicting Length of Stay After Lumbar Arthrodesis: A Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Approach

被引:11
作者
Etzel, Christine M. [1 ]
Veeramani, Ashwin [2 ]
Zhang, Andrew S. [1 ]
McDonald, Christopher L. [1 ]
DiSilvestro, Kevin J. [1 ]
Cohen, Eric M. [1 ]
Daniels, Alan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Orthoped Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Div Appl Math, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION; READMISSION; COST; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00241
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the utility of machine learning techniques to predict and classify outcomes, such as length of stay (LOS), for lumbar fusion patients. Six supervised machine learning algorithms may be able to predict and classify whether a patient will experience a short or long hospital LOS after lumbar fusion surgery with a high degree of accuracy. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2009 and 2018. Demographic and comorbidity information was collected for patients who underwent anterior, anterolateral, or lateral transverse process technique arthrodesis procedure; anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); posterior, posterolateral, or lateral transverse process technique arthrodesis procedure; posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF); and posterior fusion procedure posterior spine fusion (PSF). Machine learning algorithmic analyses were done with the scikit-learn package in Python on a high-performance computing cluster. In the total sample, 85% of patients were used for training the models, whereas the remaining patients were used for testing the models. C-statistic area under the curve and prediction accuracy (PA) were calculated for each of the models to determine their accuracy in correctly classifying the test cases. Results: In total, 12,915 ALIF patients, 27,212 PLIF/TLIF patients, and 23,406 PSF patients were included in the algorithmic analyses. The patient factors most strongly associated with LOS were sex, ethnicity, dialysis, and disseminated cancer. The machine learning algorithms yielded area under the curve values of between 0.673 and 0.752 (PA: 69.6% to 80.1%) for ALIF, 0.673 and 0.729 (PA: 66.0% to 81.3%) for PLIF/TLIF, and 0.698 and 0.749 (PA: 69.9% to 80.4%) for PSF. Conclusion: Machine learning classification algorithms were able to accurately predict long LOS for ALIF, PLIF/TLIF, and PSF patients. Supervised machine learning algorithms may be useful in clinical and administrative settings. These data may additionally help inform predictive analytic models and assist in setting patient expectations. Level III: Diagnostic study, retrospective cohort study
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Extended Length of Stay After Lumbar Spine Surgery: Sick Patients, Postoperative Complications, or Practice Style Differences Among Hospitals and Physicians? [J].
Adogwa, Owoicho ;
Lilly, Daniel T. ;
Khalid, Syed ;
Desai, Shyam A. ;
Vuong, Victoria D. ;
Davison, Mark A. ;
Ouyang, Bichun ;
Bagley, Carlos A. ;
Cheng, Joseph .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 123 :E734-E739
[2]   Using Bayes' Rule to Define the Value of Evidence from Syndromic Surveillance [J].
Andersson, Mats Gunnar ;
Faverjon, Celine ;
Vial, Flavie ;
Legrand, Loic ;
Leblond, Agnes .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11)
[3]  
[Anonymous], ACS national surgical quality improvement program
[4]   Cost Analysis of Single-Level Lumbar Fusions [J].
Beckerman, Daniel ;
Esparza, Melissa ;
Lee, Sun Ik ;
Berven, Sigurd H. ;
Bederman, S. Samuel ;
Hu, Serena S. ;
Burch, Shane ;
Deviren, Vedat ;
Tay, Bobby ;
Mummaneni, Praveen, V ;
Chou, Dean ;
Ames, Christopher P. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (01) :39-46
[5]   Nearest neighbor imputation algorithms: a critical evaluation [J].
Beretta, Lorenzo ;
Santaniello, Alessandro .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16
[6]   A Novel Machine Learning Model Developed to Assist in Patient Selection for Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Biron, Dustin R. ;
Sinha, Ishan ;
Kleiner, Justin E. ;
Aluthge, Dilum P. ;
Goodman, Avi D. ;
Sarkar, I. Neil ;
Cohen, Eric ;
Daniels, Alan H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (13) :E580-E585
[7]   Deep Learning and Its Applications in Biomedicine [J].
Cao, Chensi ;
Liu, Feng ;
Tan, Hai ;
Song, Deshou ;
Shu, Wenjie ;
Li, Weizhong ;
Zhou, Yiming ;
Bo, Xiaochen ;
Xie, Zhi .
GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 16 (01) :17-32
[8]   Internal and External Validation of a Machine Learning Risk Score for Acute Kidney Injury [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Carey, Kyle A. ;
Edelson, Dana P. ;
Singh, Tripti ;
Astor, Brad C. ;
Gilbert, Emily R. ;
Winslow, Christopher ;
Shah, Nirav ;
Afshar, Majid ;
Koyner, Jay L. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (08) :E2012892
[9]   Bundled Payment Models in Spine Surgery: Current Challenges and Opportunities, a Systematic Review [J].
Dietz, Nicholas ;
Sharma, Mayur ;
Alhourani, Ahmad ;
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ;
Wang, Dengzhi ;
Nuno, Miriam A. ;
Drazin, Doniel ;
Boakye, Maxwell .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 123 :177-183
[10]   Predicting Postoperative Mortality After Metastatic Intraspinal Neoplasm Excision: Development of a Machine-Learning Approach [J].
DiSilvestro, Kevin J. ;
Veeramani, Ashwin ;
McDonald, Christopher L. ;
Zhang, Andrew S. ;
Kuris, Eren O. ;
Durand, Wesley M. ;
Cohen, Eric M. ;
Daniels, Alan H. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 :E917-E924