Numerical study on the behavior of utility tunnel subjected to ground surface explosion

被引:60
作者
Qian, Haimin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zong, Zhouhong [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Chengqing [3 ]
Li, Jun [3 ]
Gan, Lu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Engn Res Ctr Safety & Protect Explos & Impact, Minist Educ, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Utility tunnel; Ground surface explosion; ALE; Dynamic response;
D O I
10.1016/j.tws.2020.107422
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over the past few decades, underground utility tunnels have become increasingly popular in many countries, especially in North America and China. Utility tunnels host multiple services? infrastructures inside an accessible underground space that allows regular inspection, maintenance, and easy replacement. Previous studies on the safety of underground utility tunnels were mainly focused on the seismic performances, their dynamic behaviors under accidental/hostile blast loads were seldomly investigated. TM 5-855-1 is frequently employed to calculate the ground shock load and responses of buried structures. However, it is only applicable for the cases with a scaled distance larger than 0.4 m/kg1/3. The present study performs a comprehensive numerical investigation on the blast performance of utility tunnel subjected to ground surface explosion with small scaled distance. With validated material and structural models, a FEM model based on a utility tunnel project is established. The influence of charge weight on blast resistance of the utility tunnel is studied numerically. The effect of the reinforcement ratio, shear reinforcement arrangement, buried depth and wall thickness are investigated under the scenario of a sedan car bomb overhead explosion. It is found that over 200 kg TNT ground surface explosion will cause a great threat to the utility tunnel with 2 m burial depth (scaled distance smaller than 0.4 m/kg1/3). The shear reinforcement arrangement is of great importance to the blast resistance of the utility tunnel. The failure mode of the roof can be changed from combined shear and flexural failure to flexural failure, with an increased reinforcement ratio. Increased wall thickness and buried depth can improve the blast resistance of the utility tunnel as expected. Safety buried depth, and wall thickness for a sedan car bomb overhead explosion are discussed in the present study.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A SMOOTH HYPERBOLIC APPROXIMATION TO THE MOHR-COULOMB YIELD CRITERION [J].
ABBO, AJ ;
SLOAN, SW .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1995, 54 (03) :427-441
[2]   High explosive simulation using multi-material formulations [J].
Alia, A ;
Souli, M .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (10) :1032-1042
[3]  
ASCE, 2011, 5911 ASCE ASCESEI
[4]  
Baylot J.T., 1993, LOADS STRUCTURES BUR
[5]   Experimental Evaluation and Finite-Element Simulations of Explosive Airblast Tests on Clay Soils [J].
Busch, Courtney L. ;
Aimone-Martin, Catherine T. ;
Tarefder, Rafiqul A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2016, 16 (04)
[6]   Blast-loaded behaviors of severely damaged buried arch repaired by anchored CFRP strips [J].
Chen, Hailong ;
Xie, Wei ;
Jiang, Meirong ;
Wang, Peng ;
Zhou, Jiannan ;
Fan, Hualin ;
Zheng, Qing ;
Jin, Fengnian .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2015, 122 :92-103
[7]   Dynamic responses of buried arch structure subjected to subsurface localized impulsive loading: Experimental study [J].
Chen, Hailong ;
Zhou, Jiannan ;
Fan, Hualin ;
Jin, Fengnian ;
Xu, Ying ;
Qiu, Yanyu ;
Wang, Peng ;
Xie, Wei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2014, 65 :89-101
[8]  
De Anirban, 2013, Poromechanics V. Proceedings of the Fifth Biot Conference on Poromechanics, P971
[9]  
De A, 2011, GEOFRONTIERS 2011 AD, P1534, DOI [10.1061/41165(397)157, DOI 10.1061/41165(397)157]
[10]   Numerical and physical modeling of geofoam barriers as protection against effects of surface blast on underground tunnels [J].
De, Anirban ;
Morgante, Alberto N. ;
Zimmie, Thomas F. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2016, 44 (01) :1-12