Algorithms for regret theory and group satisfaction degree under interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy sets in stochastic multiple attribute decision making method

被引:11
作者
Qu, Guohua [1 ]
Li, Tianjiao [1 ]
Qu, Weihua [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Ling [4 ]
Ma, Xiaolong [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Management Sci & Engn, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Univ, Inst Management & Decis, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shanxi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Inst Petrochem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102600, Peoples R China
[5] Guilin Univ Technol, Business Sch, Guilin 541006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy set; group satisfaction degree; regret theory; stochastic multiple attribute decision making; INTEGRAL AGGREGATION OPERATORS;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-182634
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Interval-value dual hesitant fuzzy set, first proposed by Ju et al. (Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, 1203-1218, 2014). Multiple attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy information is a new research topic since dual hesitant fuzzy set was firstly proposed, it has been widely studied in the fuzzy decision making literature. As a new generalization of fuzzy sets, interval-value dual hesitant fuzzy set (IVDHF) This article develops a multi-attribute decision making method considering the regret value theory and group satisfaction for the interval-value dual hesitant fuzzy element and incomplete weight information. Considering that decision makers have different level of the degree of evaluation, firstly, based on the score function and the accuracy function of the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy element, the deviation function of the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set is defined. On this basis, a new group satisfaction is proposed. And then, for the situation where the information of attribute weight is incompletely known and completely unknown, some optimization models of attribute weight are established by using the new group satisfaction degree, and then the attribute weight can be determined. Finally, a real example of investment alternative evaluation is carried out to validate the implementation of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3639 / 3653
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Annebicque D., 2010, IFAC P, V43, P31
[2]   A robust correlation coefficient measure of dual hesitant fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision making [J].
Arora, Rishu ;
Garg, Harish .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 72 :80-92
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]  
Bell D.E., 1982, REGRET DECISION MAKI
[5]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[6]   Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Xia, Meimei .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 :528-540
[7]   Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE [J].
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Slowinski, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 41 (05) :820-846
[8]   A new distance measure for interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to group decision making problems with incomplete weights information [J].
Dugenci, Muharrem .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 41 :120-134
[9]   Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Farhadinia, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 240 :129-144
[10]  
Guo S. D., 2015, DECISION CONTROL, V30, P1635