Detecting Aberrant Behavior and Item Preknowledge: A Comparison of Mixture Modeling Method and Residual Method

被引:25
作者
Wang, Chun [1 ]
Xu, Gongjun [2 ]
Shang, Zhuoran [3 ]
Kuncel, Nathan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Quantitat Psychol, N658 Elliott Hall,75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Stat & Psychol, 311 West Hall,1085 South Univ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Stat, Ford Hall,Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Ind Org Psychol, N218 Elliott Hall,75 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
response time; aberrant behavior; item preknowledge; person-fit; mixture model; item response theory; RESPONSE-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; TEST SPEEDEDNESS; RASCH MODEL; PERSON-FIT; ACCURACY; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3102/1076998618767123
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The modern web-based technology greatly popularizes computer-administered testing, also known as online testing. When these online tests are administered continuously within a certain testing window, many items are likely to be exposed and compromised, posing a type of test security concern. In addition, if the testing time is limited, another recognized aberrant behavior is rapid guessing, which refers to quickly answering an item without processing its meaning. Both cheating behavior and rapid guessing result in extremely short response times. This article introduces a mixture hierarchical item response theory model, using both response accuracy and response time information, to help differentiate aberrant behavior from normal behavior. The model-based approach is compared to the Bayesian residual-based fit statistic in both simulation study and two real data examples. Results show that the mixture model approach consistently outperforms the residual method in terms of correct detection rate and false positive error rate, in particular when the proportion of aberrance is high. Moreover, the model-based approach is also able to correctly identify compromised items better than residual method.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 501
页数:33
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CHEATING TESTS DO IT
[2]   Item parameter estimation under conditions of test speededness: Application of a mixture Rasch model with ordinal constraints [J].
Bolt, DM ;
Cohen, AS ;
Wollack, JA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 39 (04) :331-348
[3]  
Boughton KA, 2007, STAT SOC BEHAV SC, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3_9
[4]   A Speeded Item Response Model: Leave the Harder till Later [J].
Chang, Yu-Wei ;
Tsai, Rung-Ching ;
Hsu, Nan-Jung .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2014, 79 (02) :255-274
[5]  
Dean V, 2012, MARCES BOOK SER, P55
[6]   Mixture Class Recovery in GMM Under Varying Degrees of Class Separation: Frequentist Versus Bayesian Estimation [J].
Depaoli, Sarah .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (02) :186-219
[7]   Utilizing Response Time Distributions for Item Selection in CAT [J].
Fan, Zhewen ;
Wang, Chun ;
Chang, Hua-Hua ;
Douglas, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2012, 37 (05) :655-670
[8]   Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics [J].
Karabatsos, G .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2003, 16 (04) :277-298
[9]  
Lievens F., 2009, The SAGE handbook of human resources management, P133
[10]   Testing for Aberrant Behavior in Response Time Modeling [J].
Marianti, Sukaesi ;
Fox, Jean-Paul ;
Avetisyan, Marianna ;
Veldkamp, Bernard P. ;
Tijmstra, Jesper .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2014, 39 (06) :426-451