The Equilibrium Model of Relationship Maintenance

被引:38
作者
Murray, Sandra L. [1 ]
Holmes, John G. [2 ]
Griffin, Dale W. [3 ]
Derrick, Jaye L. [4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Div Mkt, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Res Inst Addict, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
relationships; risk; threat-mitigation; trust; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; SELF-ESTEEM; SOCIAL SUPPORT; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; POSITIVE ILLUSIONS; WORKING MODELS; ATTACHMENT; TRUST; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1037/pspi0000004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A new equilibrium model of relationship maintenance is proposed. People can protect relationship bonds by practicing 3 threat-mitigation rules: Trying to accommodate when a partner is hurtful, ensuring mutual dependence, and resisting devaluing a partner who impedes one's personal goals. A longitudinal study of newlyweds revealed evidence for the equilibrium model, such that relationship well-being (as indexed by satisfaction and commitment) declining from its usual state predicted increased threat-mitigation; in turn, increasing threat mitigation from its usual state predicted increased relationship well-being. Longitudinal findings further revealed adaptive advantages to uncertain trust. First, the match between trust and partner-risk predicted the trajectory of threat mitigation over time. People who hesitated to trust a high-risk partner became more likely to mitigate threats over 3 years, but people who hesitated to trust a safe partner became less likely to mitigate threats. The match between threat mitigation and partner-risk also predicted when being less trusting eroded later relationship well-being. Namely, when women paired with high-risk partners became more likely to mitigate threats, being less trusting at marriage lost its capacity to erode later relationship well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 113
页数:21
相关论文
共 90 条
[21]   The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners [J].
Downey, G ;
Freitas, AL ;
Michaelis, B ;
Khouri, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (02) :545-560
[22]   On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures [J].
Edwards, JR ;
Bagozzi, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 5 (02) :155-174
[23]   Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis [J].
Finkel, EJ ;
Campbell, WK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) :263-277
[24]   Self-Esteem Moderates Neuroendocrine and Psychological Responses to Interpersonal Rejection [J].
Ford, Maire B. ;
Collins, Nancy L. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 98 (03) :405-419
[25]   When partner caring leads to sharing: Partner responsiveness increases expressivity, but only for individuals with low self-esteem [J].
Forest, Amanda L. ;
Wood, Joanne V. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (04) :843-848
[26]   Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains [J].
Gable, SL ;
Reis, HT ;
Elliot, AJ .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (05) :349-372
[27]   Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events [J].
Gardner, WL ;
Pickett, CL ;
Brewer, MB .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (04) :486-496
[28]  
Goldstein H, 1998, USERS GUIDE MLWIN MU
[29]   MODELS OF THE SELF AND OTHER - FUNDAMENTAL DIMENSIONS UNDERLYING MEASURES OF ADULT ATTACHMENT [J].
GRIFFIN, D ;
BARTHOLOMEW, K .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :430-445
[30]  
Holmes J.G., 1989, Review of personality and social psychology, V10, P187