Academic motivation scale - reliability and validity evidence among undergraduate nursing students

被引:2
作者
de Souza, Geisa Colebrusco [1 ]
Meireles, Everson [2 ]
Mira, Vera Lucia [3 ]
Januario Leite, Maria Madalena [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Enfermagem, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Ctr Ciencias Vida, Santo Antonio De Jesus, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Enfermagem, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM | 2021年 / 29卷
关键词
Motivation; Education; Nursing; Baccalaureate; Validation Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Factor Analysis; Statistical; Psychometrics; PERFORMANCE; AMOTIVATION; VALIDATION; EDUCATION; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1590/1518-8345.3848.3420
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: to assess the evidence of validity and reliability of the academic motivation scale (AMS) based on the internal structure. Method: this is a methodological study with 205 undergraduate nursing students. Dimensionality/internal structure of the AMS was assessed using factor analysis in the context of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and reliability of the factors was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (alpha) coefficient and composite reliability (CR) coefficient. Results: acceptable fit indexes were obtained (CFI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.07; SRMR = 0.06) for a three-dimensional model: intrinsic motivation (10 items; alpha = 0.84; CR = 0.86); extrinsic motivation (8 items; alpha = 0.84; CR = 0.90); and demotivation (4 items; alpha = 0.84; CR = 0.88). A significant correlational pattern was found for the motivation continuum. Conclusion: the dimensionality analysis for the AMS presented a model with three factors: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and demotivation, and was considered a reduced alternative to the original version of seven factors. This study helped assess the validity of the measurement instrument and its theory refinement; further studies should be conducted to assess its invariance property.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条