Pelvic Floor Levator Hiatus Measurements: MRI Versus Ultrasound

被引:19
作者
Nardos, Rahel [1 ]
Thurmond, Amy [2 ]
Holland, Amanda [3 ]
Gregory, W. Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Kaiser Permanente, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
来源
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2014年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
pelvic MRI; pelvic US; pelvic floor imaging; PUBOVISCERAL MUSCLE; WOMEN; ABNORMALITIES; INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION; SEVERITY; ANATOMY; IMAGES; ANI;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000079
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare levator hiatus measurements between pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pelvic ultrasound (US) imaging modalities. Methods: We performed pelvic MRI and 3-dimensional US in 37 asymptomatic nulliparous women. For the MRI protocols, we performed axial and sagittal sequences at rest. We then obtained sagittal sequences during Kegel squeeze and Valsalva maneuvers. Blinded to the findings of the MRI, we obtained 3-dimensional pelvic US images using a perineal approach at rest, Kegel and Valsalva maneuvers. Finally, we measured the levator hiatus in both sagittal and axial planes. Results: For the resting sagittal measurements, the mean levator hiatus measurement using MRI (5.0 cm; SD, 0.8) is significantly greater than that using US (4.4 cm; SD, 0.6; P < 0.05). Although the absolute mean levator measurements between the 2 modalities are significantly different, this difference is not influenced by the magnitude of the measurements as noted in Bland-Altman plots of the limits of agreement. Conclusions: We found that the MRI measurements obtained from the sagittal images were consistently greater than the corresponding US images. In contrast, there was not the same consistency of difference between MRI and US for the axial images. This suggests possible variation in acquisition planes for axial images or interpretation of landmarks for the sagittal images.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 221
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders [J].
Barber, MD ;
Kuchibhatla, MN ;
Pieper, CF ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :1388-1395
[2]  
Barry CL., 2006, AUST NZ CONTINENCE J, V12, P61
[3]  
BRINK CA, 1994, NURS RES, V43, P352
[4]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[5]   A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images [J].
Chou, Q ;
DeLancey, JOL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (01) :44-50
[6]  
DeLancey JOL, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V101, P46, DOI 10.1097/00006250-200301000-00012
[7]   Ballooning of the levator hiatus [J].
Dietz, H. P. ;
Shek, C. ;
De Leon, J. ;
Steensma, A. B. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (06) :676-680
[8]   Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani [J].
Dietz, H. P. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (03) :329-334
[9]   The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? [J].
Dietz, H. P. ;
Abbu, A. ;
Shek, K. L. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 32 (07) :941-945
[10]   A simplified method for determining hiatal biometry [J].
Dietz, Hans P. ;
Wong, Vivien ;
Shek, Ka Lai .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (06) :540-543