Integrated FDG-PET-CT: its role in the assessment of bone and soft tissue tumors

被引:14
作者
Bischoff, Mark [1 ,3 ]
Bischoff, Gisela
Buck, Andreas [2 ]
von Baer, Alexandra [3 ]
Pauls, Sandra
Scheffold, Florian [2 ]
Schultheiss, Markus [3 ]
Gebhard, Florian [3 ]
Reske, Sven N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Thorac & Vasc Surg, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Nucl Med, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[3] Univ Ulm, Dept Trauma Hand Plast & Reconstruct Surg, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
关键词
FDG-PET-CT; Musculoskeletal tumors; PET; Soft tissue tumors; Bone tumors; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS; F-18; FDG; SARCOMAS; DIAGNOSIS; BENIGN; CANCER; F-18-FDG-PET/CT; METAANALYSIS; EXTREMITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-009-0937-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively, whether integrated 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) is more accurate for determination musculoskeletal tumors compared with separate interpretation of CT and FDG-PET, because most of the current clinical data come from patients studied with PET. Eighty patients with newly diagnosed musculoskeletal tumors underwent FDG-PET-CT. CT, FDG-PET, and FDG-PET-CT were interpreted separately to determine the performance of each imaging modality. Assuming that equivocal lesions are benign, performance of diagnostic tests was as follows: sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CT alone was 81, 84, 83%, for PET 71, 82, 76, and for PET-CT 80, 83 and 86%. Assuming that equivocal lesions are malignant, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CT was 61, 100, 70%, for PET 69, 100, 79, and for PET-CT 69, 100 and 79%. Combined FDG-PET-CT reliably differentiates soft tissue and bone tumors from benign lesions. The value of the information provided by FDG-PET-CT for planning surgical procedures must be evaluated in further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 827
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ADLER LP, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P1508
[2]   GRADING LIPOSARCOMAS WITH PET USING [F-18] FDG [J].
ADLER, LP ;
BLAIR, HF ;
WILLIAMS, RP ;
PATHRIA, MN ;
MAKLEY, JT ;
JOYCE, MJ ;
ALKAISI, N ;
MIRALDI, F .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (06) :960-962
[3]   FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: Standardized uptake value in 52 lesions [J].
Aoki, J ;
Watanabe, H ;
Shinozaki, T ;
Takagishi, K ;
Ishijima, H ;
Oya, N ;
Sato, N ;
Inoue, T ;
Endo, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :774-777
[4]   The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bastiaannet, E ;
Groen, H ;
Jager, PL ;
Cobben, DCP ;
van der Graaf, WTA ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Hoekstra, HJ .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2004, 30 (01) :83-101
[5]   Treatment monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with sarcomas:: Interobserver variability of quantitative parameters in treatment-induced changes in histopathologically responding and nonresponding tumors [J].
Benz, Matthias R. ;
Evilevitch, Vladimir ;
Allen-Auerbach, Martin S. ;
Eilber, Fritz C. ;
Phelps, Michael E. ;
Czernin, Johannes ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (07) :1038-1046
[6]   FDG PET imaging for grading and prediction of outcome in chondrosarcoma patients [J].
Brenner, W ;
Conrad, EU ;
Eary, JF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (02) :189-195
[7]  
Coffin CM, 1998, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V109, pS38
[8]   Follow-up of musculoskeletal tumors I. Local recurrence [J].
Davies, AM ;
Vanel, D .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (05) :791-799
[9]  
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P713
[10]  
Dominkus M, 1998, Radiologe, V38, P82