A Robust Calibration Method for Continental-Scale Soil Water Content Measurements

被引:16
作者
Roberti, Joshua A. [1 ]
Ayres, Edward [1 ]
Loescher, Henry W. [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Jianwu [3 ]
Starr, Gregory [4 ]
Durden, David J. [1 ]
Smith, Derek E. [5 ]
de la Reguera, Elizabeth [3 ]
Morkeski, Kate [3 ]
McKlveen, Margot [3 ]
Benstead, Heidi [4 ]
SanClements, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Robert H. [1 ]
Gebremedhin, Maheteme [6 ]
Zulueta, Rommel C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ecol Observ Network, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[3] Marine Biol Lab, Ecosyst Ctr, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Dept Biol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Canc Ctr, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[6] Kentucky State Univ, Dep Environm Studies & Sustainable Syst, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
HEAT-PULSE METHOD; TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY; FIELD-EVALUATION; MOISTURE; PROBE; UNCERTAINTY; TEMPERATURE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.2136/vzj2017.10.0177
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Technological advances have allowed in situ monitoring of soil water content in an automated manner. These advances, along with an increase in large-scale networks monitoring soil water content, stress the need for a robust calibration framework that ensures that soil water content measurements are accurate and reliable. We have developed an approach to make consistent and comparable soil water content sensor calibrations across a continental-scale network in a production framework that incorporates a thorough accounting of uncertainties. More than 150 soil blocks of varying characteristics from 33 locations across the United States were used to generate soil-specific calibration coefficients for a capacitance sensor. We found that the manufacturer's nominal calibration coefficients poorly fit the data for nearly all soil types. This resulted in negative (91% of samples) and positive (5% of samples) biases and a mean root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.123 cm(3) cm(-3) (1 sigma) relative to reference standard measurements. We derived soil-specific coefficients, and when used with the manufacturer's nominal function, the biases were corrected and the mean RMSE dropped to +/- 0.017 cm(3) cm(-3) (+/- 1 sigma). A logistic calibration function further reduced the mean RMSE to +/- 0.016 cm(3) cm(-3) (+/- 1 sigma) and increased the range of soil moistures to which the calibration applied by 18% compared with the manufacturer's function. However, the uncertainty of the reference standard was notable (+/- 0.022 cm(3) cm(-3)), and when propagated in quadrature with RMSE estimates, the combined uncertainty of the calibrated volumetric soil water content values increased to +/- 0.028 cm(3) cm(-3) regardless of the calibration function used.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Evaluation of methods for determining soil aggregate stability [J].
Almajmaie, Abbas ;
Hardie, Marcus ;
Acuna, Tina ;
Birch, Colin .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2017, 167 :39-45
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIM CHANG 2007
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Environmental Soil Physics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Environmental Considerations
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NIST HDB 105 1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 001307VC NEON DOC
[6]  
[Anonymous], CAL MAN SENT SOIL MO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 42 SOIL SURV STAFF N
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, METHODS SOIL ANAL, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2-D.C21
[9]  
[Anonymous], EOS T AGU
[10]  
[Anonymous], SENS ENV OBS REP NSF