Capacity of a transmission tower under downburst wind loading

被引:25
作者
Mara, T. G. [1 ]
Hong, H. P. [2 ]
Lee, C. S. [2 ,3 ]
Ho, T. C. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Lab, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc, 650 Woodlawn Rd West, Guelph, ON N1K 1B8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
transmission towers; downbursts; extreme winds; nonlinear analysis; Monte Carlo technique; LINE TOWERS; MICROBURST; FAILURE; TORNADO; SURFACE; CURVES;
D O I
10.12989/was.2016.22.1.065
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The wind velocity profile over the height of a structure in high intensity wind (HIW) events, such as downbursts, differs from that associated with atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) winds. Current design codes for lattice transmission structures contain only limited advice on the treatment of HIW effects, and structural design is carried out using wind load profiles and response factors derived for ABL winds. The present study assesses the load-deformation curve (capacity curve) of a transmission tower under modeled downburst wind loading, and compares it with that obtained for an ABL wind loading profile. The analysis considers nonlinear inelastic response under simulated downburst wind fields. The capacity curve is represented using the relationship between the base shear and the maximum tip displacement. The results indicate that the capacity curve remains relatively consistent between different downburst scenarios and an ABL loading profile. The use of the capacity curve avoids the difficulty associated with defming a reference wind speed and corresponding wind profile that are adequate and applicable for downburst and ABL winds, thereby allowing a direct comparison of response under synoptic and downburst events. Uncertainty propagation analysis is carried out to evaluate the tower capacity by considering the uncertainty in material properties and geometric variables. The results indicated the coefficient of variation of the tower capacity is small compared to those associated with extreme wind speeds.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 87
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010, ASCE MAN REP ENG PRA, V74
[2]  
ANSYS&REG
[3]  
, 2007, ANSYS MULT REL 9 0
[4]   Assessment of tornado hazard for spatially distributed systems in southern Ontario [J].
Banik, S. S. ;
Hong, H. P. ;
Kopp, Gregory A. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (8-9) :1376-1389
[5]  
Banik SS, 2010, WIND STRUCT, V13, P1
[6]   Load factor calibration for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada: Statistics of loads and load effects [J].
Bartlett, FM ;
Hong, HP ;
Zhou, W .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2003, 30 (02) :429-439
[7]  
Canadian Standards Association (CSA), 2010, 6082610 CSA CANCSAC2
[8]  
Darwish MM, 2011, WIND STRUCT, V14, P481
[9]  
Davenport A.G., 1979, P 5 INT C WIND ENG F
[10]  
Durst C.S., 1960, METEOROL MAG, V89, P181