Comparative life cycle assessment of diesel production from crude palm oil and waste cooking oil via pyrolysis

被引:15
作者
Intarapong, Pisitpong [1 ,4 ]
Papong, Seksan [2 ]
Malakul, Pomthong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Ratchaburi Campus, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] Natl Met & Mat Technol Ctr, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Petr & Petrochem Coll, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Ctr Excellence Petrochem & Mat Technol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
life cycle assessment; global warming; net energy ratio; pyrolysis; waste cooking oil; crude palm oil; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1002/er.3433
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment has been widely accepted as an effective tool to assess the environmental impacts of various biofuels in comparison with conventional fuels to quantify the potential benefits in both energy and environmental aspects. This work focused on life cycle assessment of the production of diesel via pyrolysis using two potential feedstocks in Thailand: crude palm oil (CPO) and waste cooking oil (WCO). The system boundary consists of the cultivation, harvesting, transportation, pyrolysis, distillation, blending, and vehicle testing (combustion). Inventory data were collected at the pilot plant of the Center for Fuels and Energy from Biomass of Chulalongkorn University located in Saraburi province. All collected data were input into SimaPro program to evaluate the relevant environmental impacts such as global warming potential, acidification, and ozone depletion based on a functional unit of 1MJ of diesel. For the fuel production, the resulting diesel was blended with conventional diesel at 2, 5, and 20wt% to obtain blended diesel fuels (B2, B5, and B20), respectively. The energy and potential environmental impacts of the diesel fuels produced from two different feedstocks, CPO and WCO, were compared based on cradle-to-grave. The results showed that net energy ratio with its co-products of WCO-based diesel (3.12) was higher than that of CPO-based diesel (2.12). Because of the large amount of energy use for diesel production in pyrolysis and distillation processes, global warming potential was the main environmental impact. From scenarios, it can be concluded that recycling methane from exhaust gas and replacing liquefied petroleum gas by natural gas lead to reduce energy input of 2% and global warming potential impact over 10%. Pyrolysis oil is possible to improve over time on account of the increase of waste palm oil and development of new technologies. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 713
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 1404420061 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 1404020061 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMP LIFE CYCLE GREE
[4]  
Antes M, 2009, PROPANE REDUCES GREE
[5]   Net Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Microalgae [J].
Batan, Liaw ;
Quinn, Jason ;
Willson, Bryan ;
Bradley, Thomas .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (20) :7975-7980
[6]  
Beer T., 2007, The greenhouse and air quality emissions of biodiesel blends in Australia, DOI DOI 10.1080/15440478.2014.929556
[7]  
CANADA IC, 2012, LIF CYCL GREENH GAS
[8]   Waste Cooking Oil as an Alternate Feedstock for Biodiesel Production [J].
Chhetri, Arjun B. ;
Watts, K. Chris ;
Islam, M. Rafiqul .
ENERGIES, 2008, 1 (01) :3-18
[9]  
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, 2013, EN THAIL FACTS FIG Q
[10]  
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, 2011, POT FEAS STUD BIOM L