The Utility of the Pandemic Grief Scale in Identifying Functional Impairment from COVID-19 Bereavement

被引:21
作者
Lee, Sherman A. [1 ]
Neimeyer, Robert A. [2 ,3 ]
Breen, Lauren J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Christopher Newport Univ, Dept Psychol, Newport News, VA 23606 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Portland Inst Loss & Transit, Portland, OR USA
[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Psychol, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
coronavirus; COVID-19; functional impairment; grief; incremental validity; pandemic;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2021.0103
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Meeting the needs of people bereaved by COVID-19 poses a substantial challenge to palliative care. The Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) is a 5-item mental health screener to identify probable cases of dysfunctional grief during the pandemic. Objective: The PGS has strong psychometric and diagnostic features. The objective was to examine the incremental validity of the PGS in identifying mourners at risk of harmful outcomes. Design: A cross-sectional survey design involving sociodemographic questions and self-report measures of pandemic grief, generalized anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, separation distress, functional impairment, meaning-making difficulties, and substance use coping. Setting/Subjects: A sample of people bereaved through COVID-19 (N = 1065) in the United States. Results: Fully 56.6% of participants scored above the cut score of >= 7 on the PGS for clinically dysfunctional pandemic grief and 69.7% coped with their loss using drugs or alcohol for at least several days in past two weeks. PGS scores were not associated with time since loss. Hierarchical multiple regression models demonstrated that the PGS uniquely explained variance in functional impairment, meaning-making difficulties, and substance use coping, over relevant background factors, bereavement-related psychopathology, and separation distress. In the final model, the standardized regression coefficients for the PGS were 2-15 times larger than for the other competing measures in explaining each of the three outcomes. Conclusions: The findings underscore the clinical utility of this short and easy-to-use measure in identifying risk of deleterious outcomes across a range of functional and behavioral domains.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / 1788
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
American Medical Association, 2020, ISS BRIEF REP INCR O, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, International Classification of Diseases
[3]   Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care [J].
Aoun, Samar M. ;
Rumbold, Bruce ;
Howting, Denise ;
Bolleter, Amanda ;
Breen, Lauren J. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10)
[4]  
Board approves new prolonged grief disorder for DSM., 2020, PSYCHIAT NEWS, DOI 10.1176/appi.pn.2020.11a12
[5]   Further validation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report (TGI-SR): A measure of persistent complex bereavement disorder and prolonged grief disorder [J].
Boelen, Paul A. ;
Djelantik, A. A. A. Manik J. ;
de Keijser, Jos ;
Lenferink, Lonneke I. M. ;
Smid, Geert E. .
DEATH STUDIES, 2019, 43 (06) :351-364
[6]   Is complicated grief a valid construct? [J].
Bonanno, GA .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2006, 13 (02) :129-134
[7]  
BREEN L, 2021, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG
[8]  
BREEN L, 2020, DEATH STUD
[9]   Bridging the Gaps in Palliative Care Bereavement Support: An International Perspective [J].
Breen, Lauren J. ;
Aoun, Samar M. ;
O'Connor, Moira ;
Rumbold, Bruce .
DEATH STUDIES, 2014, 38 (01) :54-61
[10]   An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results [J].
Chmielewski, Michael ;
Kucker, Sarah C. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (04) :464-473