A comparative life cycle assessment for sustainable cement production in Turkey

被引:70
作者
Cankaya, Simge [1 ]
Pekey, Beyhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Kocaeli Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-41380 Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
Alternative fuel and raw material; Cement; Clinker; Environmental impact; Life cycle assessment; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; LCA; WASTE; IMPLEMENTATION; INCINERATION; POTENTIALS; KILNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109362
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recently, a considerable increase has occurred in cement manufacturing, which is a highly energy intensive, resource consuming, and carbon emission industry based on industrialization and urbanization. In order to minimize the adverse effects from this industry on climate change, ecosystem quality, human health, and resources for cement production, it is very important to assess the potential environmental impacts of the cement production process. In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of cement production with traditional raw material and fuel (traditional scenario [TS]) and alternative raw material and fuel (alternative scenario [AS]) usage were performed in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 and 14044 standards. The scope of the study was determined as "cradle to gate" including raw material acquisition, transportation, and manufacturing stages. The functional units were 1 ton of clinker and 1 ton of cement. SimaPro 8.0.4 software was used for the LCA, and impact assessment was carried out using the IMPACT 2002 + method. As a result of the LCA for clinker production, the overall environmental impact was reduced by approximately 12% in the AS. According to damage assessment, the effects on climate change, human health, ecosystem quality, and resources decreased 1.4%, 27%, 10%, and 11%, respectively. The use of alternative fuel and raw material had approximately 3% positive impact on overall environmental burden of clinker production. Considering cement types, the lowest environmental impacts were determined for CEM IV and CEM II based on trass usage.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]  
Humbert S., 2014, IMPACT 2002 USER GUI, DOI DOI 10.22005/BCU.224812
[32]   A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies [J].
Huntzinger, Deborah N. ;
Eatmon, Thomas D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (07) :668-675
[33]  
ISO, 2006, ISO 14044. Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines
[34]   Perspectives for pilot scale study of RDF in Istanbul, Turkey [J].
Kara, Mustafa ;
Gunay, Esin ;
Tabak, Yasemin ;
Yildiz, Senol .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (12) :2976-2982
[35]   Waste materials co-processing in cement industry: Ecological efficiency of waste reuse [J].
Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz ;
Fortes Palau, Jose Carlos ;
de Camargo, Jose Rubens .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 19 :200-207
[36]   The LCA of portland cement production in China [J].
Li, Chen ;
Cui, Suping ;
Nie, Zuoren ;
Gong, Xianzheng ;
Wang, Zhihong ;
Itsubo, Norihiro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (01) :117-127
[37]   Appropriateness of environmental impact distribution methods to model blast furnace slag recycling in cement making [J].
Mendes Saade, Marcella Ruschi ;
da Silva, Maristela Gomes ;
Gomes, Vanessa .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 99 :40-47
[38]   Critical analysis of the Life Cycle Assessment of the Italian cement industry [J].
Moretti, L. ;
Caro, S. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 152 :198-210
[39]  
Morsali S., 2016, Environ. Energy Econ, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.11648/J.EEE.20160101.11
[40]  
Panahandeh Azadeh, 2017, Environmental Quality Management, V27, P57, DOI 10.1002/tqem.21513