Low-rank coal pyrolysis polygeneration technology with semi-coke heat carrier based on the dual-fluidized bed to co-produce electricity, oil and chemical products: Process simulation and techno-economic evaluation

被引:22
作者
Zhu, Yao [1 ]
Li, Kaikun [1 ]
Wang, Qinhui [1 ]
Cen, Jianmeng [1 ]
Fang, Mengxiang [1 ]
Luo, Zhongyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Low-rank coal; Dual-fluidized bed pyrolysis polygeneration; Semi-coke heat carrier; Techno-economic analysis; Environmental assessment; DIMETHYL ETHER; GASIFICATION; BIOMASS; POWER; SYSTEM; COMBUSTION; METHANOL; SNG; TAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107217
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Pyrolysis polygeneration technology is a good way to realize clean and efficient utilization of low-rank coal and heat carrier is a key factor. Aspen Plus is used to establish low-rank coal pyrolysis staged conversion poly-generation technology with semi-coke heat carrier based on dual-fluidized bed (CPSCPC-DFB), which couples with ultra-supercritical semi-coke powder furnace for power generation. Three processes are simulated to co-produce methanol (CPSCPC-DFB-M), synthetic natural gas (CPSCPC-DFB-S) and hydrogen (CPSCPC-DFB-H). Mass and carbon balance are established, techno-economic, environmental and sensitivity analysis are carried out, and the comparison with ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant (SCFP) is made. The results show that the comprehensive performances of CPSCPC-DFB-M, CPSCPC-DFB-S and CPSCPC-DFB-H are significantly better than those of SCFP in energy loss (49.37%, 47.33%, 45% and 55.6%), CO2 emissions (2.07, 2.12, 2.22 and 2.52 kg/ kgcoal), internal rate of return (23.24%, 21.83%, 29.52% and 17.56%). Although the total investment of CPSCPC-DFB is much higher than SCFP, the net present value is better than SCFP. Comparing the three polygeneration systems, the total investment and CO2 emissions of CPSCPC-DFB-H are slightly higher than those of other two systems, but CPSCPC-DFB-H has absolute advantages in economy. Sensitivity analysis shows that the anti-risk ability of the polygeneration systems are significantly improved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Adnan M.A., 2021, ENERGY, V1
[3]   Conceptual Design and Techno-economic Analysis of a Coal to Methanol and Ethylene Glycol Cogeneration Process with Low Carbon Emission and High Efficiency [J].
Chen, Jianjun ;
Qan, Yu ;
Yang, Siyu .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (13) :5229-5239
[4]   Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated SOFC and coal gasification system [J].
El-Emam, Rami Salah ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Naterer, Greg F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (02) :1689-1697
[5]   Biomass and coal co-feed power and SNG polygeneration with chemical looping combustion to reduce carbon footprint for sustainable energy development: Process simulation and thermodynamic assessment [J].
Fan, Junming ;
Hong, Hui ;
Jin, Hongguang .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 125 :260-269
[6]  
Gao M., 2013, COAL CHEM IND, V98, P411
[7]   Thermodynamic and economic analysis of polygeneration system integrating atmospheric pressure coal pyrolysis technology with circulating fluidized bed power plant [J].
Guo, Zhihang ;
Wang, Qinhui ;
Fang, Mengxiang ;
Luo, Zhongyang ;
Cen, Kefa .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 :1301-1314
[8]   Environmental impact comparison of typical and resource-efficient biomass fast pyrolysis systems based on LCA and Aspen Plus simulation [J].
Han, Duoduo ;
Yang, Xiaoxiao ;
Li, Rui ;
Wu, Yulong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :254-267
[9]   Supercritical CO2 cycle for coal-fired power plant based on calcium looping combustion [J].
Hanak, Dawid P. ;
Michalski, Sebastian ;
Manovic, Vasilije .
THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2020, 20
[10]   Proposal and energy saving analysis of novel methanol ? electricity polygeneration system based on staged coal gasification method [J].
He, Song ;
Li, Sheng ;
Gao, Lin .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 233 (233)