TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE PARTICIPATION DOMAIN OF THE STROKE IMPACT SCALE IN PERSONS WITH CHRONIC STROKE

被引:5
作者
Ekstrand, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Lexell, Jan [1 ,4 ]
Brogardh, Christina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Hand Surg, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol & Rehabil Med, Lund, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Neurosci, Rehabil Med, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
outcome assessment; psychometrics; rehabilitation; reproducibility of results; self-report; social participation; stroke; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.2340/16501977-2378
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and variability of the Participation domain of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS Participation) in persons with stroke as it is widely used to assess perceived participation in rehabilitation after stroke. Design: A test-retest design. Subjects: Forty-five persons (mean age 65 years) with mild to moderate disability at least 6 months post-stroke. Methods: The SIS Participation domain was rated on 2 occasions, 1 week apart. The test-retest reliability of the total score was evaluated using Kappa statistics. The 8 item scores were evaluated by the proportion of participants who rated the same score (percentage agreement, PA) or +/- 1 point (PA <= 1 point) at T1 and T2. The Svensson method was used to evaluate systematic and random disagreement. Results: The test-retest reliability of the total score showed excellent agreement (Kappa coefficient = 0.79). The items showed high PA <= 1 point (> 82%). No items, except 2, showed a systematic disagreement, and no items showed a random disagreement according to the Svensson method. Conclusion: The SIS Participation domain is reliable in persons with chronic stroke and mild to moderate disability and can be used to assess perceived participation in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 846
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], STROK CER ACC
  • [2] The stroke impact scale 3.0 - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version
    Carod-Artal, Francisco Javier
    Coral, Luciane Ferreira
    Trizotto, Daniele Stieven
    Moreira, Clarissa Menezes
    [J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (09) : 2477 - 2484
  • [4] Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale
    Duncan, PW
    Bode, RK
    Lai, SM
    Perera, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (07): : 950 - 963
  • [5] Fleiss J. L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
  • [6] What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology?
    Hobart, Jeremy C.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Warner, Thomas T.
    Thompson, Alan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 259 (12) : 2681 - 2694
  • [7] The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Alonso, Jordi
    Stratford, Paul W.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [8] Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
    Perenboom, RJM
    Chorus, AMJ
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (11-2) : 577 - 587
  • [9] Social participation: Redesign of education, research, and practice in occupational therapy
    Piskur, Barbara
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2014, 21 : 89 - 95
  • [10] Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data
    Svensson, Elisabeth
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (26) : 3104 - 3117