Identification of areas vulnerable to soil erosion risk in India using GIS methods

被引:34
作者
Biswas, H. [1 ]
Raizada, A. [1 ]
Mandal, D. [2 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Srinivas, S. [3 ]
Mishra, P. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Soil & Water Conservat Res Ctr, Hospet Rd, Bellary, Karnataka, India
[2] ICAR Indian Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Dehra Dun 248195, Uttarakhand, India
[3] Natl Bur Soil Survey & Land Use Planning, Reg Ctr, Hebbal, Karnataka, India
关键词
VALUES; STATES; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/se-6-1247-2015
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to provide information for policymakers and soil conservation planners in the form of district-wise soil erosion risk (SER) maps prepared for the state of Telangana, India. The SER values for each district were computed by extracting the information on grid-wise soil erosion and soil loss tolerance limit values existing on the country-scale in a GIS environment. The objectives of the study were to (i) identify the areas of the state with a high erosion risk, and (ii) identify areas with an urgent need of conservation measures. The results reveal that around 69% of the state has a negligible risk of soil erosion above the tolerance limits, and does not call for immediate soil conservation measures. The remaining area (2.17M ha) requires conservation planning. Four districts, viz. Adilabad, Warangal, Khammam, and Karimnagar are the most risk-prone with more than one-quarter of their total geographical areas showing net positive SER values. In order to obtain a clearer picture and categorize the districts based on their extent of vulnerability, weighted erosion risk values were computed. Adilabad, Warangal, and Khammam were identified as the worst-affected districts in terms of soil erosion, and therefore are in need of immediate attention of natural resource conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1257
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STRONG UNCCD LAND DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NBSS PUBLICATION, V94
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, National Soil Survey Handbook
[5]  
[Anonymous], 10 INT SOIL CONS ORG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1980, SOIL EROSION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SPECIAL PUBLICATION
[8]   Soil loss tolerance limits for planning of soil conservation measures in Shivalik-Himalayan region of India [J].
Bhattacharyya, P. ;
Bhatt, V. K. ;
Mandal, D. .
CATENA, 2008, 73 (01) :117-124
[9]   FUZZY CLASSIFICATION METHODS FOR DETERMINING LAND SUITABILITY FROM SOIL-PROFILE OBSERVATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY [J].
BURROUGH, PA ;
MACMILLAN, RA ;
VANDEURSEN, W .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1992, 43 (02) :193-210
[10]   Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India [J].
Chatterjee, Shuvabrata ;
Krishna, A. P. ;
Sharma, A. P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 71 (01) :357-374