Buckling of stainless steel welded I-section columns

被引:9
作者
Tuezney, Stijn [1 ]
Lauwens, Kathleen [1 ,2 ]
Afshan, Sheida [3 ]
Rossi, Barbara [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Civil Engn, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Res Fdn Flanders, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Civil Maritime & Environm Engn, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Buckling; Continuous Strength Method; Eurocode; I-section; Reliability assessment; Stainless steel; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; CURVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111815
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper studies the buckling behaviour and design of welded I-section stainless steel columns. Experimental and numerical structural performance data together with the design methods for stainless steel welded I-section columns available in the literature have been collated and reviewed. A numerical modelling programme including validation and parametric studies has been carried out to supplement the literature experimental and numerical data for the assessment of the existing codified and literature proposed flexural buckling design formulations for stainless steel welded I-section columns. Columns of austenitic, duplex and ferritic stainless steel grades undergoing major axis and minor axis flexural buckling have been investigated. From comparisons with the EN 1993?1-4 (EC3) flexural buckling capacity predictions, it was found that (1) for the austenitic welded Isection columns, the EC3 buckling curve (? = 0.76 and ?0 = 0.2) is suitable for both axes, (2) for the duplex and ferritic grades, the EC3 buckling curve (? = 0.76 and ?0 = 0.2) is conservative, and a higher buckling curve with (i) ? = 0.49 and ?0 = 0.2 for both axes or (ii) ? = 0.49 and ?0 = 0.2 for minor axis and ? = 0.34 and ?0 = 0.2 for major axis may be adopted. In addition, comparisons with the recently proposed Continuous Strength Method showed marginally improved strength predictions but with slightly higher scatter.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Standardised material properties for numerical parametric studies of stainless steel structures and buckling curves for tubular columns [J].
Afshan, S. ;
Zhao, O. ;
Gardner, L. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2019, 152 :2-11
[2]   Reliability analysis of structural stainless steel design provisions [J].
Afshan, S. ;
Francis, P. ;
Baddoo, N. R. ;
Gardner, L. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2015, 114 :293-304
[3]   Experimental Study of Cold-Formed Ferritic Stainless Steel Hollow Sections [J].
Afshan, S. ;
Gardner, L. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (05) :717-728
[4]   Numerical investigation on buckling resistance of stainless steel hollow members [J].
Ahmed, Shameem ;
Ashraf, Mahmud .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 136 :193-203
[5]  
AISC, 2013, DES GUID 27 STRUCT S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 1990 EN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, AS/NZS 4673:2001
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ENV 1993-1-4
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 99 BSK
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 199314 EN CEN