The Impact of Earnings variability and Regulatory Measures on Income Smoothing: Evidence from Panel Regression

被引:1
作者
Malik, Amino [1 ]
Aziz, Haroon
Saiti, Buerhan [2 ]
Din, Shahab Ud [1 ]
机构
[1] COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Management Sci, Wah Campus, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
[2] Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim Univ, Dept Islamic Econ & Finance, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
income smoothing; earnings variability; regulatory measures; capital adequacy ratio; loan to deposit ratio; LOAN-LOSS PROVISIONS; BANK-SPECIFIC DETERMINANTS; NON-PERFORMING LOANS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; BEHAVIOR; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.2478/jcbtp-2021-0009
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of variability in earnings, stringent regulatory measures and the trend of extending loans while keeping in view deposit ratio on income smoothening practices for a sample of 20 commercial banks listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) from the year 2010 to 2017. The likelihood of smoothing activities is measured through its widely used proxy, i.e. loan loss provisions (LLPs). Moreover, earnings before tax and provisions (EBTP) and loan to deposit ratio (LD) have been incorporated to determine the impact of earnings and loans to deposit ratio on income smoothening. We find that commercial banks are less likely to manage earnings through smoothening practices, which shows that commercial banks adhere to regulatory restrictions. This is further supported by the fact that income smoothing activities decrease as a result of the increase in capital adequacy ratios after the imposition of stringent rules, which exert greater regulatory pressure on banks, whereas the pace of income smoothing increases as a result of an increase in loans to deposit ratio, which reveals that banks take credit risk but manage within the ambit of regulatory restrictions. Based on the findings, we argue that the imposition of regulatory restrictions through the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has not only discouraged income smoothening through loan loss provisions but also enhances reporting quality. The results of this study provide useful insights for investors, creditors and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 201
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Acar M., 2015, J ACCOUNTING FINANCE, V5, P118
[2]  
Adzis A.A., 2010, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Income Smoothing Activities of Banks
[3]   IAS 39, income smoothing, and pro-cyclicality: evidence from Hong Kong banks [J].
Adzis, Azira Abdul ;
Tripe, David W. L. ;
Dunmore, Paul .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 8 (01) :80-94
[4]  
Agarwal S., 2007, INT REV EC FINANCE, V16, P429, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IREF.2005.08.003
[5]   Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects [J].
Ahmed, AS ;
Takeda, C ;
Thomas, S .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (01) :1-25
[6]  
Ayub H., 2016, J ISLAMIC BUSINESS M, V6
[7]   Nonlinear dynamics in discretionary accruals: An analysis of bank loan-loss provisions [J].
Balboa, Marina ;
Lopez-Espinosa, German ;
Rubia, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (12) :5186-5207
[8]  
Bancaria C., 2004, INT CONV CAP MEAS CA
[9]   Macroeconomic, Institutional and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in Emerging Market Economies: A Dynamic Panel Regression Analysis [J].
Bayar, Yilmaz .
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 8 (03) :95-110
[10]   MANAGING FINANCIAL REPORTS OF COMMERCIAL-BANKS - THE INFLUENCE OF TAXES, REGULATORY CAPITAL, AND EARNINGS [J].
BEATTY, A ;
CHAMBERLAIN, SL ;
MAGLIOLO, J .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (02) :231-261