Comparison of the classic limberg flap and modified limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: A retrospective analysis of 416 patients

被引:57
作者
Akin, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Leventoglu, Sezai [1 ]
Mentes, B. Bulent [1 ]
Bostanci, Hasan [1 ]
Gokbayir, Hakan [2 ]
Kilic, Kadir [2 ]
Ozdemir, Ersin [2 ]
Ferahkose, Zafer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bayindir Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Pilonidal sinus; Modified Limberg flap; Maceration; Recurrence; EXCISION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-008-4098-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is usually seen on the sacrococcygeal region in adolescent patients. The current study analyzed the outcome of the rhomboid excision and the Limberg flap procedure (cLF) in comparison to the modified Limberg flap procedure (mlF) for PSD. Four hundred and sixteen patients with PSD were operated on under spinal or general anesthesia by cLF and mlF. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1, cLF was performed on 211 patients. In Group 2, mlF was performed on 205 patients. No significant difference was detected between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of sex, age, preoperative disease period, follow-up time, the mean hospital stay, and hypoesthesia. The mlF group had better clinical results than the cLF group. The recurrence rate was statistically higher in the cLF group 1 than in the mlF group (P = 0.036). The time to return to work, time to walk without pain, and time to be able to sit on the toilet without pain were longer in the cLF group (P = 0.001). The maceration and wound infection rate were statistically higher in the cLF group than in the mlF group (P = 0.020 and P = 0.019, respectively). The mlF is a more effective treatment than cLF for the surgical management of PSD.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 762
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: long-term results in 411 patients [J].
Akin, M. ;
Gokbayir, H. ;
Kilic, K. ;
Topgul, K. ;
Ozdemir, E. ;
Ferahkose, Z. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 10 (09) :945-948
[2]  
Akinci ÖF, 1999, EUR J SURG, V165, P339
[3]   THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PILONIDAL DISEASE - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
BISSETT, IP ;
ISBISTER, WH .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 57 (12) :939-942
[4]  
BOSCOM JU, 1994, CURR PRACT SURG, V6, P175
[5]  
Chintapatla S, 2003, Tech Coloproctol, V7, P3
[6]   Superiority of asymmetric modified limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease [J].
Cihan, A ;
Ucan, BH ;
Comert, M ;
Cesur, A ;
Cakmak, GK ;
Tascilar, O .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (02) :244-249
[7]  
da Silva JH, 2000, DIS COLON RECTUM, V43, P1146
[8]   Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? [J].
Ertan, T ;
Koc, M ;
Gocmen, E ;
Aslar, AK ;
Keskek, M ;
Kilic, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (03) :388-392
[9]   Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap [J].
Eryilmaz, R ;
Sahin, M ;
Alimoglu, O ;
Dasiran, F .
SURGERY, 2003, 134 (05) :745-749
[10]   Comparison of outcomes in Z-plasty and delayed healing by secondary intention of the wound after excision of the sacral pilonidal sinus: Results of a randomized, clinical trial [J].
Fazeli, Mohammad Sadegh ;
Adel, Maryam Ghavami ;
Lebaschi, Amir H. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (12) :1831-1836