Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations' Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being

被引:52
作者
Becker, William J. [1 ]
Belkin, Liuba Y. [2 ]
Conroy, Samantha A. [3 ]
Tuskey, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, 7054 Haycock Rd,Suite 350, Falls Church, VA 22043 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
electronic communication; job demands-resources model; interruptions; anxiety; health; crossover effects; WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT; SELF-RATED HEALTH; JOB DEMANDS; TECHNOLOGY USE; SMARTPHONE USE; HOME INTERFERENCE; ICT-USE; STRESS; COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0149206319890655
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper tests the relationship between organizational expectations to monitor work-related electronic communication during nonwork hours and the health and relationship satisfaction of employees and their significant others. We integrate resource-based theories with research on interruptions to position organizational expectations for e-mail monitoring (OEEM) during nonwork time as a psychological stressor that elicits anxiety due to employee attention allocation conflict. E-mail-triggered anxiety, in turn, negatively affects the health and relationship quality of employees and their significant others. We conducted three studies to test our propositions. Using the experience sampling method with 108 working U.S. adults, Study 1 established within-employee effects of OEEM on anxiety, employee health, and relationship conflict. Study 2 used a sample of 138 dyads of full-time employees and their significant others to replicate detrimental health and relationship effects of OEEM through anxiety. It also showed crossover effects of OEEM on partner health and relationship satisfaction. Finally, Study 3 employed a two-wave data collection method with an online sample of 162 U.S. working adults to provide additional support for the OEEM construct as a distinct and reliable job stressor and replicated findings from Studies 1 and 2. Taken together, our research extends the literature on work-related electronic communication at the interface of work and nonwork boundaries, deepening our understanding of the impact of OEEM on employees and their families' health and well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1052
页数:29
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   E-MAIL INTERRUPTIONS AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE: IS THERE A SILVER LINING? [J].
Addas, Shamel ;
Pinsonneault, Alain .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2018, 42 (02) :381-+
[2]   Work-Family Boundary Dynamics [J].
Allen, Tammy D. ;
Cho, Eunae ;
Meier, Laurenz L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1, 2014, 1 :99-121
[3]   A Meta-Analysis of Work-Family Conflict and Various Outcomes With a Special Emphasis on Cross-Domain Versus Matching-Domain Relations [J].
Amstad, Fabienne T. ;
Meier, Laurenz L. ;
Fasel, Ursula ;
Elfering, Achim ;
Semmer, Norbert K. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 16 (02) :151-169
[4]  
Ashforth B., 2001, Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective
[5]   All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions [J].
Ashforth, BE ;
Kreiner, GE ;
Fugate, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (03) :472-491
[6]   On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state [J].
Bailey, BP ;
Konstan, JA .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2006, 22 (04) :685-708
[7]  
Bakker A.B., 2007, Journal of Managerial Pscyhology, V22, P309, DOI DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115
[8]   How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Dollard, Maureen F. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (04) :901-911
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]   Please Respond ASAP: Workplace Telepressure and Employee Recovery [J].
Barber, Larissa K. ;
Santuzzi, Alecia M. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 20 (02) :172-189