Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions

被引:152
作者
Stuart, Toby E. [1 ]
Yim, Soojin [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163 USA
关键词
Board interlocks; Board networks; Social networks; Private equity; Corporate governance; FREE CASH FLOW; DETERMINANTS; NETWORKS; SIZE; BOUNDARIES; DIRECTORS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.012
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine how board networks affect change-of-control transactions by investigating whether directors' deal exposure acquired through board service at different companies affect their current firms' likelihood of being targeted in a private equity-backed, take-private transaction. In our sample of all US publicly traded firms in 2000-2007, we find that companies which have directors with private equity deal exposure gained from interlocking directorships are approximately 42% more likely to receive private equity offers. The magnitude of this effect varies with the influence of directors on their current boards and the quality of these directors' previous take-private experience, and it is robust to the most likely classes of alternative explanations endogenous matching between directors and firms and proactive stacking of board composition by management. The analysis shows that board members and their social networks influence which companies become targets in change-of-control transactions. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 189
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] ADAMS R, 2008, ROLE BOARDS DI UNPUB
  • [2] A theory of friendly boards
    Adams, Renee B.
    Ferreira, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (01) : 217 - 250
  • [3] The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering
    Baker, M
    Gompers, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) : 569 - 598
  • [4] Option Backdating and Board Interlocks
    Bizjak, John
    Lemmon, Michael
    Whitby, Ryan
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (11) : 4821 - 4847
  • [5] BOONE A, 2009, DO PRIVATE EQU UNPUB
  • [6] The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis
    Boone, Audra L.
    Field, Laura Casares
    Karpoff, Jonathan M.
    Raheja, Charu G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 85 (01) : 66 - 101
  • [7] Market liquidity, investor participation, and managerial autonomy: Why do firms go private?
    Boot, Arnoud W. A.
    Gopalan, Radhakrishnan
    Thakor, Anjan V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (04) : 2013 - 2059
  • [8] Burt R.S., 1983, CORPORATE PROFITS CO
  • [9] The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns
    Cohen, Lauren
    Frazzini, Andrea
    Malloy, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 116 (05) : 951 - 979
  • [10] Boards: Does one size fit all?
    Coles, Jeffrey L.
    Daniel, Naveen D.
    Naveen, Lalitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) : 329 - 356