Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania

被引:15
作者
Frey, Gregory E. [1 ]
Charnley, Susan [2 ]
Makala, Jasper [3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Southern Res Stn, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific Northwest Res Stn, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Mpingo Conservat & Dev Initiat, Kilwa Masoko, Tanzania
关键词
Community-based forest management; Financial evaluation; Economic sustainability; Certification; KILWA DISTRICT; ENTERPRISES; CERTIFICATION; IMPLEMENTATION; DEGRADATION; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; INCOME; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105491
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Community-based forest management has become increasingly widespread in Africa since the 1990s as an approach to conserving local forests while contributing social and economic benefits to local communities. Community forests (CFs) can sell forest goods and services to generate revenue for community benefit. Increased understanding of whether and how CFs can be economically viable is important for assessing their potential to alleviate rural poverty and deliver benefits to local communities. Questions of viability of commercial timber-producing CFs largely have not been addressed to date in the African context, and have important ramifications for community members, government decision-makers, and external donors. We conducted an economic and financial evaluation of a group of CFs in southeastern Tanzania that sell high-value tropical timber from Forest Stewardship Council-certified community forests. We found that this group of CFs currently is not economically viable, with forest management costs 2.6 times forest revenues over the five-year study period. However, revenues appeared to be increasing and costs decreasing over the period, and in the final two years costs were about 1.5 times revenues. The largest forest management costs were related to CF establishment and maintenance, which may be driven by the cost of relying on external experts; still, these costs decreased over time. Community transfer payments-used to support local development projects or community members-were the second largest cost category, but are unrelated to forest management. Based on current prices and rates of fixed and variable costs, timber sales would have to increase almost tenfold for these communities to be economically viable independent of external donations; however, some combination of increased timber sales, increased training and capacity, capped community payments, and added timber value could be successful in achieving economic viability. Increased sales seem to be the most direct approach, but is constrained by lack of demand at present, so marketing is needed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [11] Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now?
    Charnley, Susan
    Poe, Melissa R.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2007, 36 : 301 - 336
  • [12] Cubbage F., 2015, TROPICAL FORESTRY HD
  • [13] Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017
    Cubbage, Frederick
    Kanieski, Bruno
    Rubilar, Rafael
    Bussoni, Adriana
    Morales Olmos, Virginia
    Balmelli, Gustavo
    Mac Donagh, Patricio
    Lord, Roger
    Hernandez, Carmelo
    Zhang, Pu
    Huang, Jin
    Korhonen, Jaana
    Yao, Richard
    Hall, Peter
    Del La Torre, Rafael
    Diaz-Balteiro, Luis
    Carrero, Omar
    Monges, Elizabeth
    Ha Tran Thi Thu
    Frey, Gregory
    Howard, Mike
    Chavet, Michael
    Mochan, Shaun
    Hoeflich, Vitor Afonso
    Chudy, Rafal
    Maass, David
    Chizmar, Stephanie
    Abt, Robert
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 112
  • [14] Community Forestry Enterprises in Mexico: Sustainability and Competitiveness
    Cubbage, Frederick W.
    Davis, Robert R.
    Paredes, Diana Rodriguez
    Mollenhauer, Ramon
    Elsin, Yoanna Kraus
    Frey, Gregory E.
    Gonzalez Hernandez, Ignacio A.
    Albarran Hurtado, Humberto
    Salazar Cruz, Anita Mercedes
    Chemor Salas, Diana Nacibe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2015, 34 (6-7) : 623 - 650
  • [15] Sustainability Assessment of Community Forestry Practices in Nepal: Literature Review and Recommendations to Improve Community Management
    Dahal D.S.
    Cao S.
    [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2017, 87 (1) : 1 - 11
  • [16] Indigenous community-based forestry in the Bolivian lowlands: some basic challenges for certification
    De Pourcq, K.
    Thomas, E.
    Van Damme, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2009, 11 (01) : 12 - 26
  • [17] Implementation and opportunity costs of reducing deforestation and forest degradation in Tanzania
    Fisher, Brendan
    Lewis, Simon L.
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Malimbwi, Rogers E.
    Munishi, Panteleo K.
    Swetnam, Ruth D.
    Turner, R. Kerry
    Willcock, Simon
    Balmford, Andrew
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 1 (03) : 161 - 164
  • [18] Frey G. E., INT FOREST REV
  • [19] Competitiveness, certification, and support of timber harvest by community forest enterprises in Mexico
    Frey, Gregory E.
    Cubbage, Frederick W.
    Holmes, Thomas P.
    Reyes-Retana, Graciela
    Davis, Robert R.
    Megevand, Carole
    Rodriguez-Paredes, Diana
    Kraus-Elsin, Yoanna
    Hernandez-Toro, Berenice
    Nacibe Chemor-Salas, Diana
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 107
  • [20] Adoption of project management practices: The impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations
    Golini, Ruggero
    Kalchschmidt, Matteo
    Landoni, Paolo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (03) : 650 - 663