Space systems resilience optimisation under epistemic uncertainty

被引:9
作者
Filippi, Gianluca [1 ]
Vasile, Massimiliano [1 ]
Krpelik, Daniel [2 ]
Korondi, Peter Zeno [3 ,4 ]
Marchi, Mariapia [3 ]
Poloni, Carlo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Aerosp Ctr Excellence, 75 Montrose St, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Math Sci, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[3] ESTECO SpA, Bldg B,99 Padriciano,Area Sci Pk, I-34149 Trieste, Italy
[4] Univ Trieste, Dept Engn & Architecture, Piazzale Europa 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Epistemic uncertainty; Resilient satellite; Complex systems; Evidence theory; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.08.024
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper introduces the concept of Resilience Engineering in the context of space systems design and a model of Global System Reliability and Robustness that accounts for epistemic uncertainty and imprecision. In particular, Dempster-Shafer Theory of evidence is used to model uncertainty in both system and environmental parameters. A resilience model is developed to account for the transition from functional to degraded states, and back, during the operational life and the dependency of these transitions on system level design choices and uncertainties. The resilience model is embedded in a network representation of a complex space system. This network representation, called Evidence Network Model (ENM), allows for a fast quantification of the global robustness and reliability of system. A computational optimisation algorithm is then proposed to derive design solutions that provide an optimal compromise between resilience and performance. The result is a set of design solutions that maximise the probability of a system to recover functionalities in the case of a complete or partial failure and at the same time maximises the belief in the desired target value of the performance index.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 210
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization [J].
Agarwal, H ;
Renaud, JE ;
Preston, EL ;
Padmanabhan, D .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) :281-294
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DET INV SPEC TEST PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MARKOV CHAINS
[4]  
[Anonymous], P EVOLVE
[5]   Robust optimization - A comprehensive survey [J].
Beyer, Hans-Georg ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 196 (33-34) :3190-3218
[6]  
Brown CharlesD., 2002, AIAA ED SERIES
[7]   Satellite and satellite subsystems reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling [J].
Castet, Jean-Francois ;
Saleh, Joseph H. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (11) :1718-1728
[8]   Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (11) :3639-3649
[9]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[10]   Preliminary space mission design under uncertainty [J].
Croisard, Nicolas ;
Vasile, Massimiliano ;
Kemble, Stephen ;
Radice, Gianmarco .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2010, 66 (5-6) :654-664