The rationale and technique of staged-volume arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery

被引:112
作者
Pollock, BE
Kline, RW
Stafford, SL
Foote, RL
Schomberg, PJ
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2000年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
arteriovenous malformation; complication; radiation; stereotactic radiosurgery;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00696-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective management strategy for properly selected arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients. However, the risk of postradiosurgical radiation-related injury generally limits this procedure to patients with AVMs of an average diameter of 3 cm or less. Radiosurgery of large AVMs in a planned staged fashion was undertaken to limit the radiation exposure to the surrounding normal brain. Methods and Materials: Between April 1997 and December 1999, 10 patients with a median AVM volume of 17.4 cm(3) (range, 7.4-53.3 cm(3)) underwent staged-volume radiosurgery (23 procedures). At the first radiosurgical procedure, the total volume of the AVM is estimated and a dose plan calculated that covers 10 cm(3)-15 cm(3), or one-half the nidus volume if the AVM is critically located (brainstem, thalamus, or basal ganglia), At 6-month intervals thereafter, radiosurgery was repeated to different portions of the AVM with the previous dose plan(s) being re-created utilizing intracranial landmarks to minimize radiation overlap. Radiosurgical procedures were continued until the entire malformation has been irradiated. Results: The radiation dosimetry of staged-volume AVM radiosurgery was compared to hypothetical single-session procedures for the 10 patients, Staged-volume radiosurgery decreased the 12-Gy volume by an average of 11.1% (range, 4.9-21%) (p < 0.001). The non-AVM 12-Gy volume was reduced by an average of 27.2% (range, 12.5-51.3%) (p < 0.001). Discussion: Staged-volume radiosurgery of large AVMs results in less radiation exposure to the adjacent brain. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether this technique provides a high rate of AVM obliteration while maintaining an acceptable rate of radiation-related complications. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 824
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
COLUMBO F, 1994, NEUROSURGERY, V34, P14
[2]  
de Oliveira E, 1998, NEUROL RES, V20, P673
[3]   Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic postradiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients [J].
Flickinger, JC ;
Kondziolka, D ;
Lunsford, LD ;
Kassam, A ;
Phuong, LK ;
Liscak, R ;
Pollock, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1143-1148
[4]   A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery [J].
Flickinger, JC ;
Pollock, BE ;
Kondziolka, D ;
Lunsford, LD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (04) :873-879
[5]   AN INTEGRATED LOGISTIC FORMULA FOR PREDICTION OF COMPLICATIONS FROM RADIOSURGERY [J].
FLICKINGER, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (04) :879-885
[6]   The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations [J].
Friedman, WA ;
Blatt, DL ;
Bova, FJ ;
Buatti, JM ;
Mendenhall, WM ;
Kubilis, PS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (06) :912-919
[7]   LINEAR-ACCELERATOR RADIOSURGERY FOR ARTERIOVENOUS-MALFORMATIONS - THE RELATIONSHIP OF SIZE TO OUTCOME [J].
FRIEDMAN, WA ;
BOVA, FJ ;
MENDENHALL, WM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 82 (02) :180-189
[8]   Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery [J].
Gobin, YP ;
Laurent, A ;
Merienne, L ;
Schlienger, M ;
Aymard, A ;
Houdart, E ;
Casasco, A ;
Lefkopoulos, D ;
George, B ;
Merla, JJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (01) :19-28
[9]  
HAMILTON MG, 1994, NEUROSURGERY, V34, P2
[10]   SURGICAL EXCISION OF CEREBRAL ARTERIOVENOUS-MALFORMATIONS - LATE RESULTS [J].
HEROS, RC ;
KOROSUE, K ;
DIEBOLD, PM .
NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 26 (04) :570-578