Modifying a Research-Based Problem-Solving Intervention to Improve the Problem-Solving Performance of Fifth and Sixth Graders With and Without Learning Disabilities

被引:10
作者
Krawec, Jennifer [1 ]
Huang, Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, 1507 Levante Ave Suite 237, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
关键词
problem solving; calculation; strategy instruction; cognitive strategies; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM; STRATEGY INSTRUCTION; 3RD-GRADE; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/0022219416645565
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to test the efficacy of a modified cognitive strategy instructional intervention originally developed to improve the mathematical problem solving of middle and high school students with learning disabilities (LD). Fifth and sixth grade general education mathematics teachers and their students of varying ability (i.e., average-achieving [AA] students, low-achieving [LA] students, and students with LD) participated in the research study. Several features of the intervention were modified, including (a) explicitness of instruction, (b) emphasis on meta-cognition, (c) focus on problem-solving prerequisites, (d) extended duration of initial intervention, and (e) addition of visual supports. General education math teachers taught all instructional sessions to their inclusive classrooms. Curriculum-based measures (CBMs) of math problem solving were administered five times over the course of the year. A multilevel model (repeated measures nested within students and students nested within schools) was used to analyze student progress on CBMs. Though CBM scores in the intervention group were initially lower than that of the comparison group, intervention students improved significantly more in the first phase, with no differences in the second phase. Implications for instruction are discussed as well as directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 480
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PISA 2012 ASS AN FRA
[2]   METACOGNITION AND PROBLEM-SOLVING - A PROCESS-ORIENTED APPROACH [J].
BERARDICOLETTA, B ;
DOMINOWSKI, RL ;
BUYER, LS ;
RELLINGER, ER .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (01) :205-223
[3]  
Bottge BA, 2013, LEARN DISABIL-MULTI, V19, P73
[4]  
Browne MW., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[5]  
Bryant D. P., 2013, RES BASED STRATEGIES, P58
[6]  
Carter SL, 2010, SOCIAL VALIDITY MANUAL: A GUIDE TO SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS IN APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, P1
[7]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[8]  
Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2014, DEV PROC
[9]   Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue [J].
Enders, Craig K. ;
Tofighi, Davood .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (02) :121-138
[10]  
Fuchs L.S., 2007, WHY IS MATH SO HARD, P397