Comparison of sample preparation methods for rare cell isolation in microfluidic devices

The analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is important for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Microfluidics has been employed for CTC analysis due to its scaling advantages and high performance. However, pre-analytical methods for CTC sample preparation are often combined with microfluidic platforms because a large sample volume is required to detect extremely rare CTCs. Among pre-analytical methods, Ficoll-Paque (TM), OncoQuick (TM), and RosetteSep (TM) are commonly used to separate cells of interest. To compare their performance, we spiked L3.6p1 pancreatic cancer cells into healthy blood samples and then employed each technique to prepare blood samples, followed by using a microfluidic platform to capture and detect L3.6p1 cells. We found these three methods have similar performance, though the slight edge of RosetteSep (TM) over Ficoll-Paque (TM) is statistically significant. We also studied the effects of the tumor cell concentrations on the performance of the frequently used Ficoll-Paque (TM) method. Furthermore, we examined the repeatability and variability of each pre-analytical technique and the microfluidics-enabled detection. This study will provide researchers and clinicians with comparative data that can influence the choice of sample preparation method, help estimate CIC loss in each pre-analytical method, and correlate the results of clinical studies that employ different techniques.