The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders

被引:119
作者
Donker, Tara [1 ]
Comijs, Hannie [2 ]
Cuijpers, Pim [1 ]
Terluin, Berend [3 ]
Nolen, Willem [4 ]
Zitman, Frans [5 ]
Penninx, Brenda [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, EMGO Inst, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, EMGO Inst, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, EMGO Inst, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Psychiat, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychiat, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Screening questionnaire; Depression; Anxiety; Sensitivity; Specificity; MENTAL-HEALTH SURVEY; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PRIMARY-CARE; NETHERLANDS; K6; INSTRUMENTS; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.012
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch version of the Kessler-10 (K10) as well as an extended version (EK10) in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Data are from 1607 participants (18 through 65 years, 68.8% female) of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), recruited from 65 general practitioners. Participants completed the K10, extended with five additional questions focusing on core anxiety symptoms, and were evaluated with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CID! lifetime version 2.1) to assess DSM-IV disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia). Reliability (Cronbach's a) of the Dutch K10 was 0.94. Based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for the K10 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder was found to be 0.87. The extended questions on the EK10 significantly improved the detection of anxiety disorders in particular. With a cut-off point of 20, the K10 reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.81 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. For the EK10, a cut-off point of 20 and/or at least one positive answer on the additional questions provided a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.75 for detecting any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The Dutch version of the K10 is appropriate for screening depressive disorders in primary care, while the EK10 is preferred in screening for both depressive and anxiety disorders. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 50
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P8
  • [2] The psychometric properties of the composite international diagnostic interview
    Andrews, G
    Peters, L
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) : 80 - 88
  • [3] Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
    Andrews, G
    Slade, T
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (06) : 494 - 497
  • [4] Andrews G., 2003, OUTCOME MEASURES SUI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
  • [6] Detecting depression after pregnancy:: the validity of the K10 and K6 in Burkina Faso
    Baggaley, R. F.
    Ganaba, R.
    Filippi, V.
    Kere, M.
    Marshall, T.
    Sombie, I.
    Storeng, K. T.
    Patel, V.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2007, 12 (10) : 1225 - 1229
  • [7] Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (K10)
    Baillie, AJ
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (09) : 743 - 748
  • [8] Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)
    Bijl, RV
    Ravelli, A
    van Zessen, G
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (12) : 587 - 595
  • [9] Evaluation of 2 measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population
    Cairney, John
    Veldhuizen, Scott
    Wade, Terrance J.
    Kurdyak, Paul
    Streiner, David L.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (02): : 111 - 120
  • [10] MJA practice essentials .3. Assessment of anxiety and depression in primary care
    Ellen, SR
    Norman, TR
    Burrows, GD
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1997, 167 (06) : 328 - 333