Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors

被引:10
作者
Kier, Cheryl A. [1 ]
Ives, Cindy [1 ]
机构
[1] Athabasca Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, 1 Univ Dr, Athabasca, AB T9S 3A3, Canada
关键词
Academic integrity; Academic misconduct; Higher education; Canada; Student perspectives; Instructor perspectives; Recommendations; UNIVERSITIES; PLAGIARISM;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-022-00116-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Maintaining academic integrity is a growing concern for higher education, increasingly so due to the pivot to remote learning in 2020 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We canvassed students, faculty, and tutors at an online Canadian university about their perspectives on academic integrity and misconduct. The survey asked how the university could improve policies concerning issues of academic integrity, how faculty and tutors handled cases of misconduct, about satisfaction with how academic violations were treated, and about the role of students, faculty, and tutors in encouraging academic integrity. As well, we collected suggestions from respondents for reducing cheating, addressing academic misconduct, and general ideas about academic integrity. The distinction between misconduct and integrity was not always clear in their comments. We received responses from 228 students and 73 faculty and tutors, generating hundreds of comments. In this paper we focus only on the answers to open-ended questions. Using content analysis, we categorized the replies into similar threads. After multiple iterations of analysis, we extracted three general recommendation groupings: Policy and Procedures, Compliance and Commitment, and Resources. Based on respondents' views, we propose a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity. Although we conducted the study pre-COVID-19, the recommendations apply to current and future academic integrity practices in our context and beyond.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Virtue, Utility and Improvisation: A Multinational Survey of Academic Staff Solving Integrity Dilemmas [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Pell, David J. .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2022, 20 (03) :311-333
[2]   When academic integrity rules should not apply: a survey of academic staff [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Pell, David J. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (06) :928-942
[3]  
Awosoga O Varsanyi S, 2021, PERSPECTACAD INTEGRI, V4, P91
[4]  
Bailey C., 2015, Practitioner Research in Higher Education, V9, P38
[5]  
Bates A.W., 2019, Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing, teaching and learning
[6]   Plagiarism Detection in the Classroom: Honesty and Trust Through the Urkund and Turnitin Software [J].
Belli, Simone ;
Lopez Raventos, Cristian ;
Guarda, Teresa .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS, ICITS 2020, 2020, 1137 :660-668
[7]   Developing a university-wide academic integrity E-learning tutorial: a Canadian case [J].
Benson, Lyle ;
Rodier, Kristin ;
Enstrom, Rickard ;
Bocatto, Evandro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2019, 15 (01)
[8]  
Bretag T, 2014, EXEMPLARY ACAD INTEG
[9]  
Bretag T, 2011, P AUQF 2011 DEM QUAL
[10]  
Bretag T, 2016, HANDBOOK OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY, P463, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_24