Interinstitutional variations in planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer

被引:46
作者
Matsuo, Yukinori
Takayama, Kenji
Nagata, Yasushi
Kunieda, Etsuo
Tateoka, Kunihiko
Ishizuka, Naoki
Mizowaki, Takashi
Norihisa, Yoshiki
Sakamoto, Masato
Narita, Yuichiro
Ishikura, Satoshi
Hiraoka, Masahiro
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol & Image Appl Therapy, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Sapporo Med Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Int Med Ctr Japan, Dept Community Hlth & Med, Div Prevent Med, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp E, Div Radiat Oncol, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 02期
关键词
stereotactic body radiation therapy; lung cancer; treatment planning; interinstitutional variation; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DOSE-CALCULATION; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; SMALL-VOLUME; CONVOLUTION; IRRADIATION; TUMORS; FRAME; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess interinstitutional variations in planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer before the start of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0403 trial. Methods and Materials: Eleven. institutions created virtual plans for four cases of solitary lung cancer. The created plans should satisfy the target definitions and the dose constraints for the JCOG 0403 protocol. Results: FOCUS/XiO (CMS) was used in six institutions, Eclipse (Varian) in 3, Cadplan (Varian) in one, and Pinnacle3 (Philips/ADAC) in one. Dose calculation algorithms of Clarkson with effective path length correction and superposition were used in FOCUS/XiO; pencil beam convolution with Batho power law correction was used in Eclipse and Cadplan; and collapsed cone convolution superposition was used in Pinnacle3. For the target volumes, the overall coefficient of variation was 16.6%, and the interinstitutional variations were not significant. For maximal dose, minimal dose, D95, and the homogeneity index of the planning target volume, the interinstitutional variations were significant. The dose calculation algorithm was a significant factor in these variations. No violation of the dose constraints for the protocol was observed. Conclusion: There can be notable interinstitutional variations in planning for SBRT, including both interobserver variations in the estimate of target volumes as well as dose calculation effects related to the use of different dose calculation algorithms. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 425
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[2]   The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274
[3]   Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software [J].
Bowden, P ;
Fisher, R ;
Mac Manus, M ;
Wirth, A ;
Duchesne, G ;
Millward, M ;
McKenzie, A ;
Andrews, J ;
Ball, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (03) :566-573
[4]   The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Rosu, M ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Ten Haken, RK .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) :801-815
[5]   Incorporating an improved dose-calculation algorithm in conformal radiotherapy of lung cancer: re-evaluation of dose in normal lung tissue [J].
De Jaeger, K ;
Hoogeman, MS ;
Engelsman, M ;
Seppenwoolde, Y ;
Damen, EMF ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
Boersma, LJ ;
Lebesque, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (01) :1-10
[6]   Small-volume image-guided radiotherapy using hypofractionated, coplanar, and noncoplanar multiple fields for patients with inoperable stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinomas [J].
Fukumoto, S ;
Shirato, H ;
Shimzu, S ;
Ogura, S ;
Onimaru, R ;
Kitamura, K ;
Yamazaki, K ;
Miyasaka, K ;
Nishimura, M ;
Dosaka-Akita, H .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (07) :1546-1553
[7]   Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets [J].
Haedinger, U ;
Krieger, T ;
Flentje, M ;
Wulf, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01) :239-249
[8]   Stereotactic single-dose radiotherapy of Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J].
Hof, H ;
Herfarth, KK ;
Münter, M ;
Hoess, A ;
Motsch, J ;
Wannenmacher, M ;
Debus, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02) :335-341
[9]   Implementation of FFT convolution and multigrid superposition models in the FOCUS RTP system [J].
Miften, M ;
Wiesmeyer, M ;
Monthofer, S ;
Krippner, K .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (04) :817-833
[10]   Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame [J].
Nagata, Y ;
Takayama, K ;
Matsuo, Y ;
Norihisa, Y ;
Mizowaki, T ;
Sakamoto, T ;
Sakamoto, M ;
Mitsumori, M ;
Shibuya, K ;
Araki, N ;
Yano, S ;
Hiraoka, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (05) :1427-1431