Examining PM2.5 concentrations and exposure using multiple models

被引:27
作者
Kelly, James T. [1 ]
Jang, Carey [1 ]
Timin, Brian [1 ]
Di, Qian [2 ]
Schwartz, Joel [3 ]
Liu, Yang [4 ]
van Donkelaar, Aaron [5 ,6 ]
Martin, Randall V. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Berrocal, Veronica [8 ]
Bell, Michelle L. [9 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Air Qual Planning & Stand, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Vanke Sch Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Gangarosa Dept Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Phys & Atmospher Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[7] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Donald Bren Sch Informat & Comp Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[9] Yale Univ, Sch Environm, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
PM2.5; Air quality modeling; Ensemble modeling; Exposure inequality; AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; PREMATURE MORTALITY; FEDERAL REFERENCE; FINE; INEQUALITY; TRENDS; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2020.110432
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Epidemiologic studies have found associations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and adverse health effects using exposure models that incorporate monitoring data and other relevant information. Here, we use nine PM2.5 concentration models (i.e., exposure models) that span a wide range of methods to investigate i) PM2.5 concentrations in 2011, ii) potential changes in PM2.5 concentrations between 2011 and 2028 due to on-the-books regulations, and iii) PM2.5 exposure for the U.S. population and four racial/ethnic groups. The exposure models included two geophysical chemical transport models (CTMs), two interpolation methods, a satellite-derived aerosol optical depth-based method, a Bayesian statistical regression model, and three data-rich machine learning methods. We focused on annual predictions that were regridded to 12-km resolution over the conterminous U.S., but also considered 1-km predictions in sensitivity analyses. The exposure models predicted broadly consistent PM2.5 concentrations, with relatively high concentrations on average over the eastern U.S. and greater variability in the western U.S. However, differences in national concentration distributions (median standard deviation: 1.00 mu g m(-3)) and spatial distributions over urban areas were evident. Further exploration of these differences and their implications for specific applications would be valuable. PM2.5 concentrations were estimated to decrease by about 1 mu g m(-3) on average due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028, with decreases of more than 3 mu g m(-3) in areas with relatively high 2011 concentrations that were projected to experience relatively large emission reductions. Agreement among models was closer for population-weighted than uniformly weighted averages across the domain. About 50% of the population was estimated to experience PM2.5 concentrations less than 10 mu g m(-3) in 2011 and PM2.5 improvements of about 2 mu g m(-3) due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028. Two inequality metrics were used to characterize differences in exposure among the four racial/ethnic groups. The metrics generally yielded consistent information and suggest that the modeled emission reductions between 2011 and 2028 would reduce absolute exposure inequality on average.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MOD ATT TEST SOFTW U
[2]   A Hybrid Approach to Estimating National Scale Spatiotemporal Variability of PM2.5 in the Contiguous United States [J].
Beckerman, Bernardo S. ;
Jerrett, Michael ;
Serre, Marc ;
Martin, Randall V. ;
Lee, Seung-Jae ;
van Donkelaar, Aaron ;
Ross, Zev ;
Su, Jason ;
Burnett, Richard T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (13) :7233-7241
[3]   Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in the United States [J].
Bell, Michelle L. ;
Ebisu, Keita .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 120 (12) :1699-1704
[4]   A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration [J].
Berrocal, Veronica J. ;
Guan, Yawen ;
Muyskens, Amanda ;
Wang, Haoyu ;
Reich, Brian J. ;
Mulholland, James A. ;
Chang, Howard H. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 222
[5]   A Spatio-Temporal Downscaler for Output From Numerical Models [J].
Berrocal, Veronica J. ;
Gelfand, Alan E. ;
Holland, David M. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2010, 15 (02) :176-197
[6]   Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA [J].
Bi, Jianzhao ;
Stowell, Jennifer ;
Seto, Edmund Y. W. ;
English, Paul B. ;
Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z. ;
Kinney, Patrick L. ;
Freedman, Frank R. ;
Liu, Yang .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 180
[7]   Racial isolation and exposure to airborne particulate matter and ozone in understudied US populations: Environmental justice applications of downscaled numerical model output [J].
Bravo, Mercedes A. ;
Anthopolos, Rebecca ;
Bell, Michelle L. ;
Miranda, Marie Lynn .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 92-93 :247-255
[8]   Extreme gradient boosting model to estimate PM2.5 concentrations with missing-filled satellite data in China [J].
Chen, Zhao-Yue ;
Zhang, Tian-Hao ;
Zhang, Rong ;
Zhu, Zhong-Min ;
Yang, Jun ;
Chen, Ping-Yan ;
Ou, Chun-Quan ;
Guo, Yuming .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 202 :180-189
[9]   Modeled and observed fine particulate matter reductions from state attainment demonstrations [J].
Cohan, Daniel S. ;
Chen, Ran .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (09) :995-1002
[10]  
Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6]