Predicting transmitted irradiance through CAD/CAM resin composite crowns in a simulated clinical model

被引:5
作者
Butterhof, Maximilian [1 ]
Ilie, Nicoleta [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Operat Restorat Dent Periodontol & Pedodont, Goethestr 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
CAD/CAM; Composite crown; Resin-based composite; Correction model; Light curing; Irradiance; Transmission; LIGHT-CURING UNITS; PATIENT SIMULATOR; CONVERSION; RESTORATION; DENTISTRY; ENERGY; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To predict the clinically relevant transmitted irradiance that is available for luting when a CAD/CAM restoration is inserted. The influence of irradiance, exposure distance, light curing unit (LCU) angulation and direction of polymerization is analyzed when curing through crowns of different thicknesses. Methods. Three modern CAD/CAM resin-based composites (RBCs) were used to produce 45 crown-shaped specimens. The distance between fissure and crown base was set at 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm (n = 5). Transmitted irradiance, while using a violet-blue LCU, was measured with a photo-spectrometer. 180 exposure conditions per specimen were investigated by variation in LCU curing mode, angulation, exposure distance and direction. Data was analyzed using univariate ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD (alpha = 0.05) and comparison of 95% confidence intervals. Results. The CAD/CAM-RBC's decadic absorption coefficient ranges from 0.317 mm(-1) to 0.387 mm(-1) and the reflection correcting factor for crowns ranges from 0.305 to 0.337. Transmitted irradiance decreases significantly with increasing exposure distance and decreasing incident irradiance. For tilt angles greater than 10 degrees, transmitted irradiances are significantly reduced (-11% for 20 degrees, -23% for 30 degrees). Significantly lowest transmitted irradiances were measured for vestibular curing direction (up to -15%). Significance. A calculation model can predict the transmitted irradiance through a CAD/CAM restoration in dependence of restoration thickness and radiant emittance. The practitioner can be supported by this model to adapt material choice of dental restoration and adhesive system to the individual situation. Variation in exposure conditions shows negative effect on the transmission of light and should be limited. (C) 2021 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1008
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review [J].
Rueggeberg, Frederick Allen ;
Giannini, Marcelo ;
Galvao Arrais, Cesar Augusto ;
Thomas Price, Richard Bengt .
BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2017, 31 :64-91
[22]   Resin-composite Blocks for Dental CAD/CAM Applications [J].
Ruse, N. D. ;
Sadoun, M. J. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 93 (12) :1232-1234
[23]  
Santini Ario, 2013, Prim Dent J, V2, P30
[24]  
Soares Carlos José, 2018, Braz. Dent. J., V29, P282, DOI 10.1590/0103-6440201802127
[25]   Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment [J].
Strasser, Thomas ;
Preis, Verena ;
Behr, Michael ;
Rosentritt, Martin .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (08) :2787-2797
[26]   Variations in tooth preparations for resin-bonded all-ceramic crowns in general dental practice [J].
Sutton, AF ;
McCord, JF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 191 (12) :677-681
[27]   Biological and Mechanical Evaluation of Novel Prototype Dental Composites [J].
Van der Laan, H. L. ;
Zajdowicz, S. L. ;
Kuroda, K. ;
Bielajew, B. J. ;
Davidson, T. A. ;
Gardinier, J. ;
Kohn, D. H. ;
Chahal, S. ;
Chang, S. ;
Liu, J. ;
Gerszberg, J. ;
Scott, T. F. ;
Clarkson, B. H. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (01) :91-97
[28]   ANALYSIS OF OPTICAL-TRANSMISSION BY 400-500 NM VISIBLE-LIGHT INTO AESTHETIC DENTAL BIOMATERIALS [J].
WATTS, DC ;
CASH, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1994, 22 (02) :112-117
[29]   Comparative in vitro wear resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic materials [J].
Zhi, Li ;
Bortolotto, Tissiana ;
Krejci, Ivo .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (02) :199-202