Transmyometrial versus very difficult transcervical embryo transfer: efficacy and safety

被引:6
作者
Khairy, Mohammed [1 ]
Shah, Hany [1 ]
Rajkhowa, Madhurima [1 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham Womens NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham Fertil Ctr, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TG, W Midlands, England
关键词
Assisted reproduction techniques; Embryo transfer; Implantation; Transmyometrial embryo transfer; PREGNANCY RATES; FERTILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.01.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A difficult and traumatic embryo transfer can negatively impact on embryo implantation. This study retrospectively compared the outcomes of "very difficult transcervical embryo transfer" (vdTCET) versus transmyometrial embryo transfer (TMET) in a single centre over 10 years, reporting on 128 patients with vdTCET and 46 patients with TMET. The definition of vdTCET was a procedure rated by an experienced practitioner (with more than 100 transfers per year for >2 years) as very difficult and required two or more of the following: use of tenaculum, change of embryo transfer catheter and use of a stylet, reloading of the embryos or cancelling the procedure and freezing the embryo to transfer after cervical dilatation. The clinical pregnancy rates for TMET and vdTCET were 32.6% and 25%, respectively and the live birth rates were 26.1% and 16.4%, respectively. There was only one case of minor bleeding in the TMET group (2.2%). This study showed that TMET is a good alternative option in cases of vdTCET where it is impossible to achieve transcervical embryo transfer and may benefit cases with repeated failed cycles after vdTCET. Its superiority over vdTCET however could not be demonstrated. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 517
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Twin pregnancy following transmyometrial-subendometrial embryo transfer for repeated implantation failure [J].
Asaad, M ;
Carver-Ward, JA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (12) :2824-2825
[2]   Transmyometrial embryo transfer and junctional zone contractions [J].
Biervliet, FP ;
Lesny, P ;
Maguiness, SD ;
Robinson, J ;
Killick, SR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (02) :347-350
[3]  
Boussin B., 1998, CONTRACEPT FERTIL SE, V26, P492
[4]  
Cook Medical, 2010, TOW TRANSM EMBR TRAN
[5]   Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF [J].
Ghazzawi, IM ;
Al-Hasani, S ;
Karaki, R ;
Souso, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (03) :677-682
[6]   Comparison of transmyometrial and transcervical embryo transfer in patients with previously failed in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles and/or cervical stenosis [J].
Groutz, A ;
Lessing, JB ;
Wolf, Y ;
Azem, F ;
Yovel, I ;
Amit, A .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (06) :1073-1076
[7]  
HFEA, 2014, FERT TRENDS FIG FERT
[8]  
KATO O, 1993, FERTIL STERIL, V59, P51
[9]   Ectopic pregnancy after transmyometrial embryo transfer: case report [J].
Lesny, P ;
Killick, SR ;
Robinson, J ;
Titterington, J ;
Maguiness, SD .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (02) :357-359
[10]   Transmyometrial embryo transfer after difficult immediate mock transcervical transfer [J].
Sharif, K ;
Afnan, M ;
Lenton, W ;
Bilalis, D ;
Hunjan, M ;
Khalaf, Y .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (05) :1071-1074