Ambitious global targets for mangrove and seagrass recovery

被引:30
作者
Buelow, Christina A. [1 ]
Connolly, Rod M. [1 ]
Turschwell, Mischa P. [1 ]
Adame, Maria F. [1 ]
Ahmadia, Gabby N. [2 ]
Andradi-Brown, Dominic A. [2 ,9 ]
Bunting, Pete [3 ]
Canty, Steven W. J. [4 ,5 ]
Dunic, Jillian C. [6 ]
Friess, Daniel A. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Lee, Shing Yip [9 ,10 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [9 ,11 ]
McClure, Eva C. [1 ,12 ]
Pearson, Ryan M. [1 ]
Sievers, Michael [1 ]
Sousa, Ana, I [13 ]
Worthington, Thomas A. [14 ]
Brown, Christopher J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Coastal & Marine Res Ctr, Sch Environm & Sci, Australian Rivers Inst, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
[2] World Wildlife Fund, Ocean Conservat, 1250 24th St NW, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] Aberystwyth Univ, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Dyfed, Wales
[4] Smithsonian Marine Stn, 701 Seaway Dr, Ft Pierce, FL 34949 USA
[5] Smithsonian Inst, Working Land & Seascapes, Washington, DC 20013 USA
[6] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, 1 Arts Link, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Nat Based Climate Solut, 16 Sci Dr 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore
[9] Zool Soc London, Mangrove Specialist Grp, Int Union Conservat Nat IUCN, Conservat Programmes, Regents Pk, London NW1 4RY, England
[10] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Life Sci, Simon FS Li Marine Sci Lab, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[11] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[12] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[13] Univ Aveiro, CESAM Ctr Environm & Marine Studies, Dept Biol, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[14] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
CONSERVATION; RESTORATION; COASTAL; FORESTS; WORLD; BIODIVERSITY; ECOREGIONS; PROTECTION; SUPPORT; LOSSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.013
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There is an urgent need to halt and reverse loss of mangroves and seagrass to protect and increase the ecosystem services they provide to coastal communities, such as enhancing coastal resilience and contributing to climate stability. Ambitious targets for their recovery can inspire public and private investment in conservation, 3 but the expected outcomes of different protection and restoration strategies are unclear. We estimated potential recovery of mangroves and seagrass through gains in ecosystem extent to the year 2070 under a range of protection and restoration strategies implemented until the year 2050. Under a protectiononly scenario, the current trajectories of net mangrove loss slowed, and a minor net gain in global seagrass extent (similar to 1%) was estimated. Protection alone is therefore unlikely to drive sufficient recovery. However, if action is taken to both protect and restore, net gains of up to 5% and 35% of mangroves and seagrasses, respectively, could be achieved by 2050. Further, protection and restoration can be complementary, as protection prevents losses that would otherwise occur post-2050, highlighting the importance of implementing protection measures. Our findings provide the scientific evidence required for setting strategic and ambitious targets to inspire significant global investment and effort in mangrove and seagrass conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1641 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] A large-scale marine protected area for the sea of Rapa Nui: From ocean grabbing to legitimacy
    Aburto, Jaime A.
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    Govan, Hugh
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 198
  • [2] Future carbon emissions from global mangrove forest loss
    Adame, Maria F.
    Connolly, Rod M.
    Turschwell, Mischa P.
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    Fatoyinbo, Temilola
    Lagomasino, David
    Goldberg, Liza A.
    Holdorf, Jordan
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Sasmito, Sigit D.
    Sanderman, Jonathan
    Sievers, Michael
    Buelow, Christina
    Kauffman, J. Boone
    Bryan-Brown, Dale
    Brown, Christopher J.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (12) : 2856 - 2866
  • [3] Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Iacona, Gwenllian D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (05) : 404 - 411
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, 10 M C PARTIES
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, CLASSES METHODS SPAT
  • [6] A fine-tuned global distribution dataset of marine forests
    Assis, Jorge
    Fragkopoulou, Eliza
    Frade, Duarte
    Neiva, Joao
    Oliveira, Andre
    Abecasis, David
    Faugeron, Sylvain
    Serrao, Ester A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [7] Atwood TB, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P523, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3326, 10.1038/nclimate3326]
  • [8] Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy
    Barnes, Megan D.
    Glew, Louise
    Wyborn, Carina
    Craigie, Ian D.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 2 (05): : 759 - 762
  • [9] Bivand R. S., 2013, Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R, V2nd, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7618-4
  • [10] Coastal wetland adaptation to sea level rise: Quantifying potential for landward migration and coastal squeeze
    Borchert, Sinead M.
    Osland, Michael J.
    Enwright, Nicholas M.
    Griffith, Kereen T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (06) : 2876 - 2887