RETRACTED: Research on the impact of social responsibility of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises on financial performance (Retracted Article)

被引:3
作者
Zhao, Xin [1 ]
Zhao, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Polytech Univ, Tianjin 300160, Peoples R China
关键词
Textile enterprises; social responsibility; financial performance; government intervention;
D O I
10.1177/0020720921999744
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
For the study of corporate social responsibility, the most fundamental problem is the relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance on enterprises, which is related to whether the enterprise should bear social responsibility directly. For a long time, state-owned enterprises of China as the backbone of social responsibility, to shoulder a large number of policy burden. When corporates' social responsibility rises to the height of the national strategic development level and becomes the focus of government attention, what is the impact of state-owned enterprise social responsibility on financial performance? Will the impact of social responsibility on financial performance in our country be different between private enterprises and state-owned enterprises? This article attempts to study these issues. The study shows that the social responsibility of Chinese enterprises has reduced its financial performance significantly. The more concerned on different aspects of social responsibility, the lower the financial performance. Secondly, compared with the private enterprises, the social responsibility of the state-owned enterprises will reduce its Financial performance, and especially in the areas where government intervention more.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ABBOTT WF, 1979, ACAD MANAGE J, V22, P501, DOI 10.5465/255740
[2]   Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Superior Financial Performance? A Regression Discontinuity Approach [J].
Flammer, Caroline .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (11) :2549-2568
[3]   Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis [J].
Lanis, Roman ;
Richardson, Grant .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 31 (01) :86-108
[4]  
Roman R.M., 1999, BUS SOC, V38, P109, DOI [10.1177/000765039903800105, DOI 10.1177/000765039903800105]
[5]  
ROSS SA, 1973, AM ECON REV, V63, P134
[6]  
Schuler DA, 2006, ACAD MANAGE REV, V31, P540, DOI [10.5465/AMR.2006.21318916, 10.2307/20159227]
[7]   POLITICIANS AND FIRMS [J].
SHLEIFER, A ;
VISHNY, RW .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :995-1025
[8]   The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda [J].
Whelan, Glen .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (04) :709-737