Post-mortem blood lead analysis; a comparison between LeadCare II and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry analysis results

Purpose: A comparison of the LeadCare II (LCII) point-of-care (POC) device with the gold standard graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS) device was done in the context of post-mortem blood lead concentrations to determine comparability for screening value.& nbsp;Methods: Consecutive autopsy cases from March 2018 to March 2019 were examined by the forensic medicine center. Blood samples with lead concentrations < 10 mu g dL(-1) by LCII analysis were excluded from GFAAS analysis. Samples were collected from femoral veins or cardiac chambers. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement between both GFAAS and LCII lead values. Linear regression modeling was performed to predict GFAAS results based on LCII results. Five-hundred post-mortem blood samples were evaluated by LCII for blood lead. For 46 cases with LCII blood lead level (BLL) values more than 10 mu g dL(-1), further analysis was performed by GFAAS.& nbsp;Results: Mean difference of BLL between the two methods was 5.92 mu g dL(-1)& nbsp;(SD = 7.51; range: -14 to 23.7). GFAAS BLL values were significantly higher than LCII values (p = 0.029). Moreover, substance-user samples had significantly higher GFAAS BLLs (p = 0.006; mean difference = 11.62 mu g dL-1). A significant regression equation was found (F [1, 44] = 108.44, p < 0.001, with an R2 of 0.711). Based on Bland-Altman plot averages for both predicted GFAAS BLL and measured GFASS BLL showed a mean difference was 0.014 (SD = 7.51; range: -17.9 to 20).& nbsp;Conclusion: In conclusion, on post-mortem BLL samples, LCII and GFAAS show favorable correlation. LCII can be used as a screening technique for post-mortem blood lead analysis.